If so, why? Evaluate the picture
http://i141.photobucket.com/albums/r77/rocketllamafootie/nataliavodianova.jpg
2007-12-13 11:08:06 · 11 answers · asked by De Pazzi 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Visual Arts ➔ Photography
I mean, if an average person saw it, what would they think of it?
2007-12-13 11:15:29 · update #1
Andrew Warhola (August 6, 1928 – February 22, 1987) Your missed oh great one!
the images are good on their own, try something that hasnt been done 50 million times already
EDIT: Moe i said the source images are good, why make them cheap by copying someone elses concept, perhaps your just to easily pleased? What hasnt been done a gillion times - original images, personally i have seen this done so many times its not funny, like in school.
Think about it, we are all saying its just copying someone else, if you are on your own, there is a reason for that?
a
2007-12-13 11:28:50 · answer #1 · answered by Antoni 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
It's sort of Andy Warhol(esque). I like it. It shows many dynamics in one composition, it's playful, sexy, and evocative. It's pleasant to the eye and the red makes it pop. I think it's an awesome photograph. I'm sorry I don't have anything more to say in the way of an evaluation, there aren't very many more words I could use to describe it. Is it yours? If so, I would love to see more of your work.
EDIT:
I had to add something after reading the other answers. Dag you people are hard to please. And antoni, what hasn't been done a gazillion times already? It's not a bad photograph, it's deliberate. When I look at all the crap out there, this is no worse, and not bad to look at.
2007-12-13 11:36:32 · answer #2 · answered by Joe Schmo Photo 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Actually, I like it a lot.
The red image just gives a nice unexpected punch to what are already superb shots.
It also has a nice, clean "sixties" feel to it...a time before we started going crazy with PhotoSlop.
Well done.
2007-12-14 13:18:06 · answer #3 · answered by V2K1 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Average people don't understand art, they might like it. The hair is not good as the lady on top of me pointed out. I tend to think it's a bit like the shots in black and white with a red rose in them - it's done to death. As others have said the images are good on their own, nice work.
2007-12-13 13:27:13 · answer #4 · answered by Jeffy 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Of course it's been done, practically nothing new under the sun in photography. The thing that bothers me is not the repetition, it's the hair being used as dental floss! I am visceral like that, so I can't appreciate the actual artistic merit because of the hair in the mouth thing.
2007-12-13 13:11:28 · answer #5 · answered by Ara57 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
it looks like a commercial print for a clothing store. It does look fun but a little over done. A bit like Andy Warhol.
2007-12-13 12:04:12 · answer #6 · answered by person_person 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I agree with the person above me. But it kind feels as if I'm looking at a model's portfolio.
2007-12-13 11:15:18 · answer #7 · answered by pastry622 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Actually, the portraits stand pretty well without the special effects.
2007-12-13 11:16:17 · answer #8 · answered by Mere Mortal 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
reduce the opacity on the red - it's just a tad strong, and you might just have something there. That's just my opinon.
2007-12-13 11:14:49 · answer #9 · answered by Dawg 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
a bit worholish but where is the golden mean...?
2007-12-13 11:13:07 · answer #10 · answered by captsnuf 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋