Al Gore claims that the U.S. is the chief cause for blocking progress at the U.N. climate conference.?

Question

Isn't this a good thing?

The money that is proposed by Al Gore & his constituents to use for his "Global Warming" agenda is just a foolish waste of resources. The U.N. is the worlds largest criminal organization and is rife with corruption.

The globe is going to warm, then it will cool, then it will warm again as it has done for many, many, many years. Don't fool yourselves into thinking humans are the cause or that we can do anything to change it.

I do think that by Al Gore winning the Nobel Peace Prize for a propaganda film that has over 70% of it's "facts" incorrect truly cheapens the award.

Are these the same "credible" "scientists" who were in concensus with "Global Cooling" in the 70's?

Give me a break you poor foolish lemmings...

Justin - How can you even say (type) that and keep a straight face. One of the WORLD'S most renknown climate scientists - Dr. William Gray, stands on the opposite side of all the so called majority. I have done EXTENSIVE research on this subject myself and I have concluded that MORE scientists sit on my side of the issue than on the "Global Warming" activists side. They just are not given the same stage to let the world know the truth of this.

Answer 1

When the AGW Theory is disproven - I wonder if "Cry Baby Al Gore" will throw a fit - especially if his 'carbon credits' scheme falls apart.

Talk about a corrupt U.N.:
U.N. Blackballs International Scientists from Climate Change Conference
http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=22401

"The scientists, citing pivotal evidence on climate change published in peer-reviewed journals, have expressed their opposition to the UN's alarmist theory of anthropogenic global warming. As the debate on man-made global warming has been heating up, the UN has tried to freeze out the scientists and new evidence, summarily dismissing them with the claim "the science is settled."

Check out the number and quality of scientists that attempted to petition the U.N.:
http://www.nationalpost.com/news/story.html?id=164004

How_Would_I_Know for got to mention that Alfred Nobel was a Socialist and that prize would NOT LIKELY TO GO TO ANY CONSERVATIVE. Ara Fathead is considered the Granddaddy of Terrorists that micromanaged terrorists up till he died - after that there was no terrorism for several months.

Answer 2

a greater valuable question may be, "Why are maximum of ecu international places no longer blocking off progression on the Bali climate convention?" the respond has no longer something to do with even if if American leaders somewhat have faith Al Gore is solid or incorrect. The U.S. has basically 4 and a million/2 p.c. of the international's inhabitants, in spite of the undeniable fact that it makes use of 25% of the international's oil output. The U.S. is hooked on low value oil. In Europe, gasoline fees the equivalent of $7 to $8 consistent with gallon, and the end result's that the individuals there have lots greater valuable public transportation than we do and that they force smaller autos. no one there somewhat suffers by using value of gasoline. The U.S. has maximum inexpensive gasoline fees of any non oil exporting united states, yet human beings nonetheless ***** approximately discomfort on the pump whilst the value is going up some pennies, by using fact they like to have the skill save using their gasoline guzzeling SUVs, without sacrafice. Oil is a constrained source. Over a million/2 of the international's grant could already be used up. - yet many human beings might fairly save using it as rapid as achieveable, than save some for the subsequent era. meanwhile we spend hundreds of billions of greenbacks on the militia, partly to maintain the cheap grant of oil coming in. it somewhat is uncommon to confirm a situation, the answer to which help solves maximum of different problems. scaling down at using oil interior the U.S. might- - save some oil for the subsequent era. - decrease our dependence on oil imports - with all the subject concerns that motives. - help the international warming situation. - Stimulate company develop in industries that produce sparkling and effectual technologies.

Answer 3

Yes;

If global warming wipes out half the nations, it is such a disaster.

Al Gore knows what he talks. He sacrificed the US presidency for environment movement.

He organized world wide SOS music marathons. He lead the new pop and cultural paradigms. Let us all demand new world order and as a force wipe the national boundaries and give a way for elite few to rule us into the future. Only they can face and crush the world terrorism. It is time that world adopt "new world order" and make Al Gore the "president of the world."

Even pop starts love Al Gore; why not you?

Answer 4

You have the right to your opinion, and yes, various organizations can or have known to be corrupt.

That being said, I would look at what you yourself can do to work on this problem. Start there. My suggestion is to take a Buddhist approach and not rant on others, but look at your own behavior.

Unfortunately, we may think people are stupid, or manipulative, but it is our own behavior which we have control over.

That all being said, I understand why you would be frustrated.

Answer 5

Fortunately the Y!A crowd doesn't represent the real world. In the real world, there is very little controversy about global warming. Just about every climatologist, biologist, and legitimate scientist in the field who has done extensive research supports all of the claims Gore makes about climate change and acknowledges that humans are largely responsible for it. There is no Global Warming agenda, nor is there a Global Warming controversy. Just people who deny the science and choose to remain ignorant.

And it irritates me that something as important as the environment is being made into a partisan issue just because Al Gore is involved. But then again people who deny science, logic, and truth aren't known for their intellectual integrity.

Answer 6

The Nobel Prize comittee also decided to give the peace award to the leader of a terrorist organization.. it doesn't mean much anymore.

Answer 7

Yes it is a very good thing.As you say,"Global warming has NOTHING to do with human activities"(It is political "JUNK science" and Enviro- Cultism at its worst!!!!).
If it did,how do they explain the polar ice caps also melting on MARS????!!!!!
It is caused by the increased solar flare activity of the last decade or so that is the cause of any slight increase in average temperature.(Oh BTW,I will be SHOVELING about 6-8 inches of "Global Warming" ie.-SNOW by 7pm tonight!)

Answer 8

Exactly - We don't need the UN to reduce pollution, including ghg's, we need liberals to get out of the way.

Imagine being able to build nuclear power plants.

Then opening up power generation to the Free Markets where people could choose to buy clean energy, and forcing electric corporations to be clean in order to compete.

Then homes could get rid of gas water heaters and gas or oil furnaces. Homes could be all electric, putting an end to millions of homes each burning something to keep their water and homes warm.

Electric cars would be piratical. No longer would they be charged by burning coal.

These small changes would reduce ghg's in half, but since they require no gvmt control, and don't raise your taxes, they ain't going to happen.

Answer 9

Al Gore is playing politics with America’s future and he needs to shut the @$#* up.

Answer 10

If Al gore would shut his pie hole, there would be a substantially lower concentration of Carbon Dioxide emissions.