English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I always thought this was the case and then came across this YouTube and would like your opinions as well. It's nothing 'in your face' but if you read between the lines it is biased.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-kZIXDzC8NM

2007-12-13 04:46:13 · 13 answers · asked by Abdul 5 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

my point is that they seem VERY pro-muslim.

2007-12-14 21:07:23 · update #1

13 answers

Political correctness ensures that the worst aspects of islam are not publicised. For example, you will never see a true representation of the origins of the Islamic religion on TV or in any of the mass media. There are all sorts of portrayals of the life of Jesus in the media, some good, some bad, some grossly distorted, but you won't see any portrayal of the life of Muhammad in the mass media. We have to ask why?

2007-12-13 06:56:20 · answer #1 · answered by A.M.D.G 6 · 1 0

BBC seem a bit 'establishment' to me. They are trying to project an image that everything is basically OK in the UK and abroad - so generally they downplay outrages of any sort (you could say this is just British cool). They are a bit softer on the government than Channel 4, for instance. Someone like the 10 oclock news reader Huw has a strong sense of humour, and he had to try hard to keep a straight face about the Teddy issue. It was ridiculous when you think of all the millions the Sudanese gov have sent to the grave in the last 15 years.

2007-12-13 05:17:07 · answer #2 · answered by Cader and Glyder scrambler 7 · 2 0

I continually have been given the effect they have been relatively biased against Obama - inspite of each thing, they're those asserting "nicely, even with being forward interior the polls, Obama won't win as a results of people asserting "nicely, we will vote obama" yet then balloting for the white guy whilst they get to the polling station"..... i assume it relies upon on the journalists viewpoint, yet the two way they're plenty much less biased that maximum folk of different information channels, yet right here and out of the country. And the reason we don't vote for our maximum well known is as a results of the fact our PM has no-the place close to the capability of the President of the U. S., so....we vote in a occasion, and that they've the capability, no longer the single guy.

2016-12-11 03:38:19 · answer #3 · answered by veloso 4 · 0 0

Yes. No no longer produce anything even handed and has been more obvious since the Professor Kelly murder.
I think they are now far to much under the heel of this traitorous and lying government

2007-12-13 04:56:53 · answer #4 · answered by Scouse 7 · 2 0

Actually it didn't seemed to biased - however, I am not saying there could be some merit to your reading between the lines.

Good Luck!!!

2007-12-13 10:07:21 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

yeah totally can see
the media has always given a bad name for muslims it portrys the few bad muslims and the rest of us just get tarred wih the same brush

2007-12-14 04:41:42 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I assure you that all news channels allow the uglyness of Islam to escape the public eye.

2007-12-13 04:50:54 · answer #7 · answered by Poor Richard 5 · 2 1

ask yourself why Omid Djalili gets a half hour prime time saturday slot when many much more teallented comedians don't get a look in

2007-12-13 06:14:58 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

No its not, as one who lives in the city that's been bombed by these nutters. Take that as read.

2007-12-13 04:51:01 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

No, but considering how racist and stupid the whole teddy bear incident was, they were very civilized.

2007-12-13 04:55:55 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers