i don't think they do. when you grow older (like senior citizen older), i think lust somehow diminishes and what's left is love in its most wonderful form. i sound totally corny but anyway...
great thing though if they existed together...
2007-12-13 03:52:42
·
answer #1
·
answered by Ida 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
Not always. Love is deeper within and Lust is on the skin. Lust can come and go but love stays forever.
2007-12-13 11:49:39
·
answer #2
·
answered by Kyle W 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Of course you can....their are men who love girls but think of them as their buds and vice versa...but when having a boyfriend/girlfriend why settle for a relationship that doesn't include lust (passion), makes the relationship have more spark. Best Wishes and Happy Holidays
2007-12-13 11:50:08
·
answer #3
·
answered by Military Mama due 03/09 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I love my brother without lust. That's love, is it not?
If you mean romantic love, course you can love without lust. You might not be attracted to them, but love them enough to take a bullet for them.
2007-12-13 11:49:49
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
of course, you love your parents and you don't lust after them. You love other friends and family and don't lust after them.
are you asking if you can love a romantic partner without lust? Then I'd say no, they aren't a romantic partner.
2007-12-13 11:50:55
·
answer #5
·
answered by Invisigoth 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
you can love someone but not be in love and still have lust. however lust is very important in a relationship....
2007-12-13 11:56:27
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hm...some good answers to this...but it brings another question...can love lead to lust to where they work together in the proper relationship?
2007-12-13 11:52:56
·
answer #7
·
answered by imaginadia510 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
no they dont have to go together but it is really fun if they do
yes you can love someone without lust which is prolly better
2007-12-13 11:49:17
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
you can love someone like a brother, sister or family. but for romantic love should have some form of just.
2007-12-13 11:49:47
·
answer #9
·
answered by [kristi lou!♥] 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
absolutely! to be in love does not mean you have to be lustful about it.
2007-12-13 11:55:45
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋