Yes, you can heres a little proof.
-Atheist- Try to prove me wrong.
If it’s true there a beginning to the universe, as modern Cosmologists now agree, Then this implies a cause that Transcends the universe.
If the laws of physics are fine-tuned to permit life, as contemporary physicists are discovering, then perhaps there’s a designer who fine-tuned them.
If there’s Information in cell, as molecular biology show, Then this suggest intelligent design .
to get life going in the first place would have required biological information; the implications point beyond the material realm to a prior intelligent cause.
2007-12-13 02:54:29 · 33 answers · asked by Cody™ 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Wait, How can a Human eye form without an Eyelid to protect it?
or, how can you have a brain without the heart?
Evolution is so fake it's not even funny.
2007-12-13 03:08:45 · update #1
Source: A Case For a Creator...Great Book
2007-12-13 03:11:42 · update #2
God shows himself when needed.....Jesus is God
2007-12-13 02:58:17 · answer #1 · answered by jesussaves 7 · 0⤊ 10⤋
1. A beginning to the universe does not imply that the first cause was sentient or anthropomorphic. You can call it God if you want, but, then again, you could call gravity God and just settle for that as well.
2. The fact that life has occurred within the confines of the law of physics does not imply that the laws of physics were specifically meant for that to occur...if it was, there would much more life in the universe than we can observe now.
3. DNA does not prove a Creator. I can't think of particular reason to refute the idea that it was intelligently designed, unfortunately, because it is very intricate in nature. Yet, I assume that life would not exist without this DNA, and life itself is complex. I'm not sure if complexity itself is enough to prove God's existence, as it could have been assembled through chance as much as through deliberation.
4. I don't know why requiring DNA to live means that a Creator must exist. The reason why DNA is necessary is to assure that cells adopt the proper functions. I'm not sure why an all-powerful God would have to use such methods to assure life.
2007-12-13 02:57:39 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 9⤊ 0⤋
This proof of Allah, Amon, Yu Ti, Zeus or other gods as much as your God. Cosmologist not agree what you say. Even if universe begin, still no reason to say gods exist. Life adapt to condition, not condition desin for life. Argue in circle, I forget name of logic error. Physicist not discover what you say. Of course, information in DNA, not suggest ID at all. Biologists find amino acid form naturlly, not need designer. Who design your designer. If you say he alaways here, universe always here instead. You quote creationist, he distort science, use false science. Easy prove you wrong, say wrong thing.
2007-12-13 03:09:18 · answer #3 · answered by miyuki & kyojin 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Proof of god is all around us. What I can't come to grips with is, that you think you know what this god wants thinks and says. You believe that this god set out to only create us and that all of the universe is in some way a support mechanism for us. Your so arrogant. If you really believed that god created all then you would be humbled and quite.
There are no believable gods.
2007-12-13 03:09:01 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Science has only hit the tip of the largest nail you can imagine. There are other solar systems buddy. That's enough to tell me your bible is dead wrong. And this "intelligent design" took billions of years to get to where we are now. It's not like in your story book where Adam and Eve just walked out of the garden and the earth was habitable. Don't they teach you anything in school??
2007-12-13 03:05:11 · answer #5 · answered by Blame Amy 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Listen, bro, I understand your zeal, but it's misguided.
I myself believe in God. But, it is completely and utterly pointless to try and reason or prove using logic that there is a God to people that do not believe there is.
It is impossible to prove or disprove there is a God. That is a fruitless debate and always goes nowhere.
People will either choose to believe or not believe. It's a personal choice. People can argue back and forth on both sides till there out of breath, and not get anywhere. One either believes or they don't, it's that simple.
2007-12-13 03:06:46 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is not true that Astrophysics thinks there was a beginning to the multiple universes that surround this one. I don't know where you get that. So your starting premise is totally wrong.
Information does not suggest design either. Life is here because it can exist here. It ain't the other way around.
2007-12-13 03:00:15 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
Your idea of proof is to say "prove me wrong"?
ROFLMAO
As for your specific points of nonsense:
IF the Universe has to have a cause, the only thing we can say about it is that it had a one-time ability to cause a universe; it doesn't have to be "Transcendent".
The laws of physics have to permit lifeforms like us to live in this Universe or we wouldn't be here. DUH. We're here, Einstein, so it means we're possible.
You need to look up "information"
The implications do no such thing.
2007-12-13 03:00:26 · answer #8 · answered by Hera Sent Me 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋
If ignorance is bliss you must be ecstatic!!!
Why do Christians try so hard to twist, distort and discredit science? What are they afraid of? Was God too stupid to have been able to use evolution as his tool?
Christianity is a faith - those with weak faith seek proof and fear atheists - well we know where you fit in that now do we not?!!!!!!!
2007-12-13 03:39:06 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You've proven a well known flaw in most scientific theories, but no way on Thor's green earth does that prove God exists.
2007-12-13 03:05:03 · answer #10 · answered by P 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sounds like Lamarckian Biology. This was debunked 150 years ago.
2007-12-13 03:01:43 · answer #11 · answered by 2 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋