If there is "new scientific evidence" that would prove the existence of God, why would they keep it a secret and not release it to the world?
Do they NOT want to prove once and for all that their God exists? Or do they want to keep the knowledge all to themselves?
Aren't they required by the Bible to share their knowledge?
Or are they doing it for petty reasons - "neener neener neeeeeennneeeerrrr"?
Or are they defining the word "soon" the same way their messiah did when he told them he'd be returning "soon"?
C'mon...if you guys have "new scientific evidence," let's see it already...
2007-12-12 14:05:57 · 21 answers · asked by eris 4 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
They will never prove what's not there. And I find it interesting that these believers claim they need no proof, they have faith. If they ever had any hard proof: DNA, carbon testing, whatever, wow, then we'd see how fast they'd think scientific proof is great.
2007-12-12 14:09:38 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
i'm not responsive to "6 scientific proofs". One can't the two tutor or disprove the existence of God. There MANY indicators which advise He exists. One being the uncomplicated actuality that there had to first reason. Scientists have suggested that the universe is increasing. this provides credence to the "enormous Bang" concept. If there replaced right into a "enormous Bang", there had to be a reason. yet another: in our plane of existence, be counted may well be neither created nor destroyed... it variations style. So the place did it come from? without divine author then all that exists had to take place with the help of random possibility. Scientists assist you already know that the climate for a single strand of DNA coming at the same time interior the primordial soup have been billions upon billions to one. you nevertheless have not got DNA, you nevertheless have not got existence. yet it happened. no person even has an concept that covers the delivery of existence. then you definately've all the different "how could it have happened?" questions.... how did cellular diversification take place? Did this single cellular organism come to a decision that it mandatory some cells to act as a liver or as kidneys? a brilliant one in my strategies is that scientists assist you already know that the irrational can't produce the rational. in user-friendly terms a rational being can produce a rational being. So the place did intelligence come from? All of those point out that a rational strategies had to be the motivator and guider for our existence.
2016-10-02 08:50:41 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I really don't know what you are talking about... it sounds like your experiences are specific to you and don't resemble the rank and file of Christians or Atheists.
I can think of a few times where I've been told that evidence of certain things were coming "soon", and the reasoning is that you need to get theories published and then need to demonstrate it's ability to withstand scrutiny from scientific peers to declare something "proof" or "truth".
I have no clue what this person was referring to, but it is possible that he waiting for a release and verification of the information so that it would be widely accepted by the time he suggested it to you. This could of course also be a "she" or might not even exist, I'm trying my best to answer your question hypothetically because I have not experienced the situation you have presented.
2007-12-12 14:29:50 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm glad you asked. The new evidence has been written in The Bible ,Torah and The Dead Sea Scrolls since the beginning. We just didn't know how to interpret it until now. I have learned how to interpret this scientific based scripture and that is the reason I am now trying to teach and bring this new knowledge out into the mainstream public. The problem has been the same as all new discoveries. It takes time for the public to accept it as true and force a change in thinking. I would love to write a book about what I now know. Anybody out there interested in helping me let me know. God will bless us for it.
2007-12-12 14:22:15 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
It is not possible to prove or disprove the existence of God using Science, because science is not in the business of testing the untestable. Unless a test can be devised to measure the existence of the supernatural, anyone who claims that they have "scientific proof or evidence" of the existence of God is either wrong, lying, or delusional. Science has its limitations, and proving or disproving the existence of God is one those limitations.
2007-12-12 14:13:06 · answer #5 · answered by Paul Hxyz 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Science has been unable to explain countless miracles such as the Eucharist becoming actual human flesh and even bleeding years and years after the original occurrence. Why would science just not be so sure God is real? If you need proof, you should examine some of the signs of Gods' work that abound in our world right now.
2007-12-12 14:13:24 · answer #6 · answered by Frankencow 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
You answered your own question - SOON
Quantum physics implies a god. It is not yet proof. Some say, with more experiments and facts coming in, we will one day have proof. But not of the Biblical god, where'd you get that? It's proof of a universal conscious connection. Pantheism!
2007-12-12 14:09:49 · answer #7 · answered by Persona 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No god. No evidence forthcoming. End of story.
2007-12-12 14:11:16 · answer #8 · answered by ? 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
They will see him but it won't be of science ,God is
spirit and no man has seen him and lived, and science
can not prove God,they do not know him.
2007-12-12 14:17:01 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Har. If those people could prove anything, they would, just to spite everyone else. There's no proof. That's why I'm an Agnostic.
2007-12-12 14:10:07 · answer #10 · answered by Phoenix_Slasher 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋