As Always they don't have any logical solution. when they don't have their answers they start to make mockery out of you. they would tell you about your bad grammar and they would tell you oh your stats are wrong etc. here is the solution
Even if every man got married to one woman, there would still be more than thirty million females in U.S.A who would not be able to get husbands (considering that America has twenty five million gays). There would be more than four million females in Great Britain, 5 million females in Germany and nine million females in Russia alone who would not be able to find a husband. Suppose your sister happens to be one of the unmarried women in USA. The only two options remaining for her are that she either marries a man who already has a wife or becomes 'public property'. There is no other option. All
those who are modest will opt for the first. Most women would not like to share their husband with other women. But in Islam when the situation deems it really necessary Muslim women in due faith could bear a small personal loss to prevent a greater loss of letting other Muslim sisters becoming 'public properties'.
So this is up to them now what they choose for their sisters. because having mistresses in west and America is no problem but having second wife big problem because they have to give both of them equal rights.
2007-12-12 13:05:13
·
answer #1
·
answered by Adeel A 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
I deserve a medal for the kind of cases i've got spoke back this one ;) no longer a speck of dirt, i'm afraid. extremely, a random quantum fluctuation ensuing in a singularity of unfavourable stress vacuum skill. With me so a ways? No? Me neither, a minimum of no longer a hundred%. nonetheless, the individuals who're in the understand approximately cosmology and quantum mechanics look happy with the belief. Empirical data backs it up; multiple experiments have verified count could be generated spontaneously without every physique to make it take place. Observable data of the residual energies from the start of the universe (that are extremely seen; turn a television to a sparkling channel and a few million% of the static you spot is leftover microwave radiation from the enormous Bang) lower back issues up additionally. It additionally ability that no longer basically is God no longer mandatory, he's likewise extremely no longer likely. of direction, the universe itself and all this taking place is quite no longer likely. yet, as somebody reported as quickly as, 'No-one has tried to count huge sort the failed tries.'
2016-10-11 04:16:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
WTF is your point? And, "it's medically proven that women cannot remain virgins"? You must be relying on the research of western medicine, where the professionals, through their incompetence, kill hundreds of thousand per year. The ones "big pharma" misses with their toxic potions.
Any woman who chooses to have no sexual/penetrative "activity" remains a virgin. As a service to the species, in view of the fact that men are far more belligerent than women, being lower on the "evolutionary scale", based on my experience, perhaps we should just "whack" the "excess", and even out the numbers? Especially excess republicans, fundy Xians, and other cretins. That's fairly "logical" :))
2007-12-12 13:00:26
·
answer #3
·
answered by drakke1 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Actually, the excess of women doesn't really kick in till you get to the elderly population, unless the demography is distorted by men killed in war: women live longer than men.
And there are, in fact, about 50 million MORE MALES in the world than females. Didn't need to ask God, just googled it.
http://www.xist.org/earth/pop_gender.aspx
2007-12-12 12:58:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
i think you are putting things out of perspective. 7.8 out of 300 million aint much. Niether is 9 million out of God knows how many people there are in Russia. Plus there is an easy solution. All males will never get married because some males play too much WoW.
2007-12-12 12:54:41
·
answer #5
·
answered by Panda WafflesZilla 3
·
4⤊
1⤋
How many of those women are lesbians? And where is this proof that women can't remain virgins? And what does that have to do with anything?
The logical solution is to let people choose who they want to be with. If they don't end up with someone it would suck, but they don't have the right to take someone else's partner.
2007-12-12 12:55:39
·
answer #6
·
answered by Eiliat 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
To go over your question - let's exclude the part about the gays. Reason? For each gay man there's a gay woman - so they equal out.
There are several ways to go around where you are going - but a description would put me in instant bannation by the Yamster, so I'll stop there for now.
2007-12-12 12:54:04
·
answer #7
·
answered by Big Super 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
China would be happy to take them, as their population control policies have created millions more boys than girls. But your statistics are still wrong.
2007-12-12 13:12:54
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
there are more females because men tend to die younger - more males are actually born - some contend that this is due to the extra weight of a sperm carrying an X chromosome (larger than Y)
2007-12-12 12:59:54
·
answer #9
·
answered by PD 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Logical solution. Combine that with fake medical conclusions with no evidence or references, and this makes no sense. Moving on.
2007-12-12 12:55:17
·
answer #10
·
answered by Phoenix_Slasher 4
·
3⤊
1⤋