Yes.
Praise the lord.
Where's the beef?
Hallelujah.
2007-12-12 12:08:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by dddbbb 6
·
5⤊
6⤋
When I think of all the best tasting meat sacrificed to God . . . . . ORDAINED BY GOD, I think that it must have been the best barbecue smelling place ever. No wonder Eli was fat! PETA might even have Christians in it. But they tend to remind me more of the typical liberal fascist mindless people that they portray themselves as. If PETA says that they are not against the Bible, they have to be lying.
EDIT: ALSO! Who killed the first animal and why?
Genesis 3
21 Unto Adam also and to his wife did the LORD God make coats of skins, and clothed them.
2007-12-12 12:23:59
·
answer #2
·
answered by Christian Sinner 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
This is one of the few things where Charles Darwin's Origin of Species and God have in common. Down with PETA
2007-12-12 15:08:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by Hammy H 2
·
3⤊
0⤋
Why? How? Peta just believes in no harm to animals. Where in the world do you get religion or the bible from that?
2007-12-12 12:25:11
·
answer #4
·
answered by punch 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
i think of you already do understand the style you experience approximately PETA. you basically defined it to us. the undertaking with fanatical communities like PETA is they waste distinctive power and aspects in techniques that don't particularly avert animal abuse. individually, i choose to help the SPCA (financially with donations) by using fact they are lots greater valuable in lobbying for stricter rules against animal abuse, have helped decrease the variety of euthanized animals, and don't concentration completely on attempting to hog the spotlight without particularly achieving something rational or effectual (like Peta).
2016-11-26 02:39:52
·
answer #5
·
answered by geiser 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals stands for living according to the Bible by advocating a holistic pro-life ethic, something "pro-life" "Bible-believing" religious folks don't do because they use religion as an identity source, wrapping it up with their ego. This causes all religious thought to be filtered through the ego and prevents one from seeing things correctly.
2007-12-12 12:15:09
·
answer #6
·
answered by Mr. Mandala 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
People for the Eating of Tasty Animals?
Not that I'm aware of. People ate plenty of critters in the Bible.
2007-12-12 12:09:14
·
answer #7
·
answered by ಠ__ಠ 7
·
3⤊
1⤋
I was pretty sure PETA is against everything.....
2007-12-12 12:14:32
·
answer #8
·
answered by Looking UP 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
The Bible says humans are stewards of the Earth. Wouldn't that mean protecting God's other creations?
2007-12-12 12:08:03
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
Hmm, I'd better tell my Christian friend to cease her membership in PETA if that is the case.
2007-12-12 12:08:46
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
The Bible promotes non-cruelty to animals. However, it promotes that animals are not as important as man--by any stretch.
PETA is against the Bible because it promotes both sacrifice and the eating of meat.
2007-12-12 12:09:06
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋