I think we all find this question a little.... stupid. Do you agree?
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AnHBzNm9fUh5Bq04pZEDR9fd7BR.;_ylv=3?qid=20071212163456AASqPfx
2007-12-12 11:47:03 · 25 answers · asked by Thrice Blessed 6 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Sorry about the typo. I meant Atheists.
2007-12-12 11:49:36 · update #1
Yes this question is stupid.
The one you link to is stupid as well.
2007-12-12 11:51:27 · answer #1 · answered by Uni Lib 2 · 2⤊ 6⤋
Yeah it's pretty stupid. Truth is however that men are becoming much more submissive,that part she got right. But her question itself is the dumbest way of pointing to something like that I've ever heard.There are much better examples of the feminization of the male of the species in western society than the way someone holds hands,not even sure how she figured that in.
YTP
2007-12-12 11:58:55 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
As long as the horizon of reasons is very faraway from the substantive truth ... ignoring the wind of change in the reconciliation of the past to the present achievements of mankind ... oil and water continue to separate.
2007-12-12 11:59:48 · answer #3 · answered by hugh_waters 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
you may desire to bear in ideas that the persons who draw close out on religiously proper message boards are going to be the main extreme of any place. you will discover the main vehement atheists and the main rabid Christians. surprisingly because each and every person on right here asking those styles of questions is particularly basically searching for a stable combat, so as that they ask contained in the main provocative way. maximum atheists i be responsive to permit you to be responsive to which you have the main suitable to have self assurance despite you prefer. they permit you to be responsive to they think of that's faulty, yet they might shelter your constitutional proper to have self assurance it. maximum Christians i be responsive to permit you to be responsive to "nicely, its not proper and it endangers your soul, yet once you ever exchange your ideas the two Jesus and our church would be right here for you." that's precisely what Jesus had to declare contained in the 1st place. So particularly the two factions spend plenty greater time flaming one yet another on message boards than they do in actual existence. the two Atheists and Christians contained in the actual worldwide are plenty greater clever and could tolerate one yet another. and actually tolerance and freedom are all that any persons prefer.
2016-10-01 11:21:54 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I only hope that most of the people that post such questions are trolls out for a laugh. I really hope these questions are not sincere!
2007-12-12 11:57:13 · answer #5 · answered by PROBLEM 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Yes I completely agree that Bush is a dumb president, too! Perhaps the dumbest in living memory.
2007-12-12 11:54:36 · answer #6 · answered by Orpheus Rising 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Not me, I think there are some highly pertinent issues here, which really need discussing and bringing out into the open. Honestly. Really, I do.
2007-12-12 11:51:28 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
true. and we can also agree that george bush could never be the anti-christ. us atheists think he cant be something that doesnt exist, but the anti-christ is said to be smart, articulate, charismatic, know various languages, and very attractive. and george bush just doesnt fit that description. so christians would also agree that george bush cant be the anti-christ
2007-12-12 11:54:14 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Seems like a decision one could make for themselves, but she felt it necessary to bring the bible into it. What a puppet.
2007-12-12 11:53:15 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
Yes! We agree!
I also agree Bush is a dumb president.
2007-12-12 11:50:07 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 10⤊ 0⤋
I think President Bush has done the best he could considering what he had to work with.
2007-12-12 12:00:51 · answer #11 · answered by What? Me Worry? 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋