proves that God exists. :)
agree?
2007-12-12 09:21:02 · 26 answers · asked by Here 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
I mispelled *athiest
2007-12-12 09:23:46 · update #1
*ATHEIST*
2007-12-12 09:35:49 · update #2
I suppose so... but then again, I'm anti-big bang... that doesn't prove that there was a big bang. Could you explain the question a bit? If you mean to say that the fact that there are thousands of chemical reactions going on within each atheist at any given time beyond their own control and that they breathe naturally because they are too stupid to know to do it on their own (like the rest of us), then yes, their existence does prove that God exists
2007-12-13 09:24:59 · answer #1 · answered by Matthew P (SL) 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I was willing to accept "ahtiest" as a typo.
No, the existence of people who do not believe in ridiculous statements does not prove the ridiculous statements to be true.
That is one of the points about Flying Spaghetti Monster or and the invisible Pink Unicorn
2007-12-12 17:29:37 · answer #2 · answered by Buke 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
"Ahtiest" AND "athiest" are both incorrect. It's spelled "atheist".
Our existence doesn't proof your sky-daddy. You're pre-supposing a god exists to make your circular argument.
2007-12-12 17:28:22 · answer #3 · answered by Beletje_vos AM + VT 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Do you believe in unicorns?
If not you just proved their existence!
Do you believe that there is a 10 ft high vampire/werewolf monster creeping up on you right now?
Careful how you answer that one, you don't want to suddenly have it pop into existence do you.
Can you see what a bloody stupid question this was?
2007-12-12 17:29:24 · answer #4 · answered by Simon T 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
No, the existence of an atheist proves humans exist.
The fact he defines himself as an atheist, proves that a differing viewpoint exists i.e. a theist exists.
2007-12-12 17:46:59 · answer #5 · answered by Tom :: Athier than Thou 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No more that your existence proves the Flying Spaghetti Monster exists.
Keep trying. Eventually, you will spell it correctly.
2007-12-12 17:26:27 · answer #6 · answered by novangelis 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You even spelled it wrong in your correction.....atheist is correct.
And, no, the existence of an atheist does not prove god exists anymore than it proves that Zeus exists, or Apollo exists, or Mithra exists, or Muhammad exists, or Buddha exists, and on and on and on.
2007-12-12 17:31:09 · answer #7 · answered by ndmagicman 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No, I don't agree.
It's a shame that I already handed out the 'stupidest question of the day' award. However, as the runner up, it will be your question's duty to fully uphold the title in the event the winner is unable to continue forward.
2007-12-12 17:25:56 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
So does the existence of non-believers in Zeus prove that Zeus exists, too?
2007-12-12 17:24:51 · answer #9 · answered by . 7 · 9⤊ 0⤋
The existance (sic) of atheists proves their parents existed at some point.
That's it.
2007-12-12 17:25:36 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋