Freemasons versus the Dawkins types, who would win?

Question

Now now not the Shriners. I am talking the Masons of Masons. I am saying if the Masons laid it all the the table no holds barred in an all out truth match.

Extend the expiration and also add what I am getting at the most Masons deep in the craft have had deep studies in concepts of great depth. The good basis for the fight is that many faiths claim Masons look into areas they shouldn't understanding truths in other words prodding the G-d head when we shouldn't. Versus well the Dawkins belief. It would not be your typical debate between say heads of Church and Dawkins sect. And when I say no holds barred all knowledge comes out in this debate..No secrets from the Masons and no ignored facts by Dawkin group.

Answer 1

Def would go with Freemasons!

Answer 2

Well Dawkins plays a mean game of Hearts, but the Freemasons are better at Monopoly. So you might want to be a little more specific.

Answer 3

In what type of competion.Being insulting: the Masons would really seem like hells grannies.If there were rules and discipline Dawkins would prevail,I don't agree with Dawkins he is a definite looney in my view.

Answer 4

Dawkins easily. They would be able to use their reasoning ability to work out the best strategy
Because the masons accept anybody who believes in a supreme being ,however unlikely , they would spend their time arguing with each other.

Answer 5

Freemasons' average age is around 60 to 70, so they have a disadvantage.

Answer 6

since the masons accept anyone that believes in a deity i would put money on the bigger numbers.

Answer 7

And would the tin foil hat crowd have a geek-gasm?

Answer 8

the freemasons, they have the cryptic council....and the knights templar...