2007-12-12 04:00:33 · 19 answers · asked by Cntrlcommand 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
What support is there that doggy style is not allowed?
2007-12-12 04:05:15 · update #1
What support is there for the opinion that enjoyment of sex is not permitted?
2007-12-12 04:05:52 · update #2
Wow. Some of you have a deep-seated hatred of God.
2007-12-12 04:08:23 · update #3
Who says you can't "waste" your seed?
2007-12-12 04:10:22 · update #4
What about facials?
2007-12-12 04:19:25 · update #5
I think your sister in law is not permitted
2007-12-12 04:10:48 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
look all sexual pleasures can be enjoyed by a christian because all they have to do is confess and pray and be forgiven only people who are not Christian can sin during sex. ask jimmy or ted or any other top church leader caught up in a sex scandal
2007-12-12 12:36:39 · answer #2 · answered by wreaser2000 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Male homosexuality, extramarital sex for married people are the only directly supportable, explicit prohibitions. Pre marital sex isn't explicity prohibited, nor is any particular position or activity. I could find no prohibition of lesbian sex either.
2007-12-12 12:14:06 · answer #3 · answered by steve what 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Enjoyment.
Sex, as every good Christian knows, is exclusively for producing Christian offspring within the bounds of wedlock. So it's missionary position, in the dark, preferably while reciting Scripture and steadfastly willing the incarnation of a Christian soul. To stoop so low as to enjoy it on a physical level would be like spitting in God's face.
LOL...yeah, I know, most Christians would disagree with these statements, but until very recently, this was actually the standard doctrine. It's only been modified because of SECULAR influences. (Yes, secularism! The great bogey of people who fancy themselves to be "religious.") And anyway, who's going to argue that Christianity is not fundamentally anti-sex? Not only did Jesus have to be a virgin, but so did his mother, so that he could dodge the curse of "Original Sin," which was literally conceived of as a disease that was transmitted via the semen.
Keep thumbing me down, but this is all the truth. Try researching your own religion. Read some Saint Augustine if you want to be exposed to a true sexual degenerate - and through Christianity, most of Western sexual morality is based on the ravings of this maniac.
2007-12-12 12:04:01 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 5⤋
Any sex or ejaculation that would not lead to a baby being produced.
So oral, anal, or even hand manipulation of the male would not be allowed. Because he would then spill or waste his seed.
You are also not allowed to pull out before ejaculation as that would be wasteful as well.
2007-12-12 12:08:53 · answer #5 · answered by Sapere Aude 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
no extra partners, no sodomy, But as far as enjoyment goes ...I don't believe you can say that God didn't intend for us to enjoy sex for its own sake.
I think it was more likely some masturbating clergy that put the "only for procreation" crap out there.
2007-12-12 12:09:51 · answer #6 · answered by tincre 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
A video camera
2007-12-12 12:05:58 · answer #7 · answered by Biker4Life 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
i suppose , sex before tying the knot...well i guess a couple is supposed to look at it as a means of bringing their children into this world.....therefore any other reasons to have sex ...eg...for pleasure was frowned upon....
2007-12-12 12:08:10 · answer #8 · answered by lotus 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
bizar tools
like socks shoes sandals newspapers binary graphics
2007-12-12 12:07:50 · answer #9 · answered by gjmb1960 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's existance before marriage, I guess
2007-12-12 12:03:46 · answer #10 · answered by larissa 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋