English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

7 answers

Actually Evangelicals will gain more from Romney than Huckleberry. He will have to curry their support by giving them important positions. Huckleberry will appoint fewer to show he is not favoring his own.

2007-12-12 03:25:11 · answer #1 · answered by Isolde 7 · 1 0

Thats a good reason. Elect Romney to hurt Evangelicals.

And atheists call believers stupid!

2007-12-12 09:28:34 · answer #2 · answered by Ruth 7 · 1 1

Hey, it's obvious our country needs a big change in direction. After 8 years of George W, I really don't care who gets elected, as long as he/she is nothing like our current president.

2007-12-12 09:29:48 · answer #3 · answered by Open Heart Searchery 7 · 1 1

Pay attention to the right polls. Romney is not in the 'conservative' running. The news polls show him 2nd and 3rd, but he is not doing that good.
Grassfire (conservative poll) shows Huckabee at 34%, and the next closest is Rudy J at 16%

2007-12-12 09:29:15 · answer #4 · answered by Poor Richard 5 · 0 2

No man we need a hindu who believes in karma....Hindus would make awesome politicians but they don't like hanging out in congress with all the scumbags so they just stay in India and breath ecstacy in and out, I say Ram Dass, but he wouldn't be interested either, I mean therein lies the problem, what decent human would want to be a politician?

2007-12-12 09:28:21 · answer #5 · answered by Micheal M 4 · 0 2

It's not worth the cost it would be to women and non-Christian men.

2007-12-12 09:25:53 · answer #6 · answered by KC 7 · 1 2

Sounds like a lose-lose wager to me.

2007-12-12 09:24:48 · answer #7 · answered by clint 5 · 0 3

fedest.com, questions and answers