Since they refuse to stick with us, and constatntly criticize our policies
2007-12-11 23:59:27 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Why are or should the Europeans be grateful?because you entered the war(WWII)?Did you have any choice?If I remember correcly,and I do,Perl harbour happened in your turf and no self-respecting army would have allowed Japanese to inflict them a Perl Harbour when all the indications were there but you did zilch to prevented it...and Japan was not even a pinprick in comparison to Germany...
So you entered the war and sent material to the Russians to kill Germans because you knew that The Russians were killing Germans at a rate of over 4600 a day (something you would have never been able to do..)...and if the Russians didn't hold, you knew you were the next target...and I have news for you my American friend...would you have stopped the German 325 divisions with your 60-70 maximum until then with zero experience?not in your wildest dreams...for the
same reason you helped England with materials...if England fell you new you you were the next step...
So you gave materials but the bodies getting killed and the cities bombed were Russian or English...and they did that killing Germans... and in 1944 you took part in the opening of the second front when the war had already been decided in the east.Please come to your senses and stop calling the Europeans ungrateful because you haven't even shown cause
why Europeans should be grateful instead of you been grateful...
2007-12-12 07:44:06 · answer #1 · answered by ? 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
America will always help Europe. We did many times before, and we currently are right now. Even though a lot of them spit in our faces for doing with a country pretty much what we did for countries in Europe, it DOES seem ungrateful. But USA will not even look toward that because as sick and **** as you all think America is, we wouldn't let Europe just burn to the ground, that's rediculous.
PS: But would Europe aid the US if the US is attacked? That's a question someone should ask lol I can't wait to see this one.
2007-12-12 03:24:05 · answer #2 · answered by A1C Engle 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
There is this funny thing called NATO. And some USAF bases and US Army divisions still stationed in Europe. We criticize thier policies too and isnt that what you are doing? Grow up a little and understand that friends do have differences.
2007-12-12 02:12:27 · answer #3 · answered by Bob D 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
You ever hear of NATO? By the treaty, an attack on one, is an attack on all!
NATO did invoke this clause after 9-11, and that is why Afghanistan is a NATO Operation, with most members providing forces.
TOKOLOSH... "Since when is Bush the US"? He represents the US to the world. As President his words are the words of the US in the international forum. Just as Putin's are Russia's, Kim Il's are North Korea's and so on.
2007-12-12 00:59:04 · answer #4 · answered by Think for yourself 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Who's going to attack or occupy the whole of Europe? Why should Europeans be ungrateful if the USA government cannot negotiate an outcome which may be contrary to their vested interests in the 21st century?
Many millions of your own people criticise your current government's policies. The USA-occupying USA government isn't exactly running to the aid of its own citizens either. Should your citizens be grateful for not having learned in school that Europe isn't even a country?
Do you think my answer is stupid? It might be. But I was taught from an early age that a stupid question deserves a stupid answer. I always thought that was mean and not constructive. But as I grew older I realised that you just don't ask for it.
2007-12-12 00:22:46 · answer #5 · answered by Shazzbot 6 · 3⤊ 4⤋
it somewhat is the way that Propaganda works. they attempt to physique public opinion with the help of utilising different buzzwords to portray a similar image from different perspectives. Bush's grandpa funded Hitler and his daddy ran the CIA. Bush knows of all approximately the thank you to apply propaganda. The PKK has been attacking Turkish civilians in Turkey with American weapons that have been funnelled to them. Even the puppet government of Iraq considers the PKK to be a 17 november.
2016-10-02 08:37:15 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The US has already got troops over here in Europe, the latest base was set up in Romania, the Romanians are helping guard Americas back door by allowing you to use their land and airspace.
2007-12-12 03:00:22 · answer #7 · answered by conranger1 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
why should anyone stick with us? Everyone sees what a waste of resources these few years have been. Its getting nowhere. Its not up to you to decide who we aid or not. We should have kept that neutarlity in the first place and handled extremists in a different manner. Our policies do suck either way. Everyone else has to lose a freedom so we can keep ours.
2007-12-12 00:26:56 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
including Europe as one entity is wrong . each country has different policies unless we are talking of NATO in which case the US is all ready involved. ..
We could turn it around and talk of the Americas as one not just the US.
2007-12-12 00:33:21 · answer #9 · answered by DANIEL B 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋
What is your statement?
"We only come to aid if a country is our partner at any time and for any decision (or delivers loads of oil)?"
I can't believe your are meaning to say so.
It is Kindergarten-style to say "if you don't agree with everything I say you aren't my friend anymore"
What about the people inside the US who critizise the decisions? Won't you protect them as well?
Your question is full of anger and it is putting whole Europe in a pot (there are many different countries with different governments who are on very different basis with the US) - so what do you want to express through this question?
2007-12-12 00:22:00 · answer #10 · answered by ladyrose_at 2 · 2⤊ 3⤋