When some zoologist finds a T-rex completely intact with remains of a human in its stomach...ask me again then:)
2007-12-11 17:52:19
·
answer #1
·
answered by eris 4
·
3⤊
0⤋
It would not really effect my views on evolution. In the light of all the mountains of evidence for evolution, one T-Rex that's obviously much later than all the others found so far would not disprove evolution. It would suggest that at least a small population of T-Rex had survived far longer than other dinosaurs. As for my views on God and how the earth and universe came to be, it would have no effect whatsoever.
2007-12-11 21:43:39
·
answer #2
·
answered by lilagrubb 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, if found to be authentic, such a find would of course RADICALLY alter my view of evolution. The thing is, though, no zoologist, archaeologist, paleontologist or amateur fossil hunter is ever going to find a T. Rex associated with human remains. The last T. Rex died out about 64 million years before the first human was around.
2007-12-11 17:58:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
If someone found a t-Rex skeleton with human bones in it then that would only support alternative history theory and view that humans are millions of years older than what mainstream history believes.That would probally bring some problems for both evolution and religion.
2007-12-11 18:01:06
·
answer #4
·
answered by upside 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
It would probably affect my views on science considering that T-rex existed 85-65 billion years ago whereas humans only came about 200,000 years ago... Other than that I'm onboard with the whole Darwin evolution thing...
2007-12-11 17:56:00
·
answer #5
·
answered by Sage B 2
·
3⤊
0⤋
properly I for one might could desire to end they had genetically re-engineered a T-Rex, for the bigger animal lived on earth at a time long before we mammals developed into diurnal floor animals. Tyrannosaurus rex - lived during what's now western North u.s., with a lots wider variety than different tyrannosaurids. greater effective than 30 specimens of T. rex have been pointed out, a number of that are almost finished skeletons. Small quantities of comfortable tissue and proteins have been reported in basically one in all those specimens. the massive situation is that one and all the T-Rex's date from the final 3 million years of the Cretaceous era, approximately sixty 8 to sixty 5 million years in the past. guy, Homo Sapiens, from evidence shows that present day human beings originated in Africa approximately 200,000 years in the past. on the time of T-rex, mammals have been a small and nonetheless incredibly minor ingredient of the fauna. Our distant ancestors lived underground removed from the dominat reptiles and dinosaurs, and got here out at night.
2016-11-25 23:58:29
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
A living T. rex means nothing on it's own. An isolated population could exist. If it was indistinguishable from the fossil versions, that would be problematic. The change would be based on the analyisis.
2007-12-11 19:11:12
·
answer #7
·
answered by novangelis 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
It would change my views on evolution but not my view on God and the Universe. Maybe Earth's history.
2007-12-11 17:53:18
·
answer #8
·
answered by Bobby K 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
Obviously it would mean that either T-Rex is a lot younger than every single piece of evidence indicates or that humanity is a lot older than any piece of evidence indicates.
But since there are millions of years separating the last dinosaur fossils and the first hominid fossils, I doubt that we'll see such a fossil.
2007-12-11 17:51:37
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
0⤋
I would wonder what a zoologist is doing out looking for fossils. Zoologists deal with the living, paleontologist deal with fossils.
2007-12-11 18:05:45
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋