2007-12-11 16:43:43 · 51 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Jesus was a real person. This AUTOMATICALLY proves Christianity is the one true religion.
But even if it didn't there is a MOUNTAIN of scientific evidence that proves if you REFUSE to belive in the correct VERSION of God, you DESERVE to be tortured FOREVER in Hell.
God does not want you to go to Hell. When he created you, he knew FOR A FACT you would die and be a good person without being a Christian and thus burn in Hell, but he chose to create you anyways.
God does not want you to burn in Hell forever. He loves you, but the rules are the rules. Believe me, God is all powerful and there is NOTHING he can't do, but if you REFUSE to believe in the correct version of God, he is POWERLESS to do anything. It would be IMPOSSIBLE for him to prevent you for burning in Hell for not being a Christian.
He wants to stop this but he CAN'T.
2007-12-11 16:47:52 · update #1
No one has answered all the questions, however it can be shown that sound science is compatible with the revelation of the Word of God, the Bible.
http://www.reasons.org/
2007-12-11 16:49:02 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
"Jesus was a real person. This AUTOMATICALLY proves Christianity is the one true religion."
Care to back this statement up with evidence? Archeologists have been searching for the slightest shred of evidence for years...and are still looking.
nobeliefs.com/exist
"But even if it didn't there is a MOUNTAIN of scientific evidence that proves if you REFUSE to belive in the correct VERSION of God, you DESERVE to be tortured FOREVER in Hell. "
Again...no there isn't. There is absolutely nothing to prove the existence of any deity. Without said evidence, the default position is non-existence.
"God does not want you to go to Hell."
Considering the power that god is described as having, you would think that anything this 'all-powerful' being didn't want to happen, wouldn't...
"God does not want you to burn in Hell forever. He loves you, but the rules are the rules. Believe me, God is all powerful and there is NOTHING he can't do, but if you REFUSE to believe in the correct version of God, he is POWERLESS to do anything. It would be IMPOSSIBLE for him to prevent you for burning in Hell for not being a Christian.
He wants to stop this but he CAN'T."
Wow...just wow...
If god is all-powerful, and (as you state) 'there is NOTHING he can't do', then you've just illustrated the logical implausibility of a deity better than any atheist possibly could. If nothing is beyond him, he could CHANGE THE RULES! If he is 'all powerful', then NOTHING could make him powerless...
Thank you. Your arguement (rant) may have produced more atheists than you could ever have hoped to.
2007-12-11 17:07:44 · answer #2 · answered by Bill K Atheist Goodfella 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Proving someone is true doesn't prove their divinity. You can prove Ghengis Khan to be a real figure, but that doesn't prove his divinity.
Do you want archaeological proof of the things that happened? It's a hit and miss. Some things have general correlation and others have none.
You're clearing just looking for answers that agree with you anyway. So posting scientific evidence proving the contrary would be a waste on you. You don't want answers, you want self-validation
2007-12-11 17:09:21 · answer #3 · answered by Moo 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Disagree. Many writings interior the Gospals are "symbolic", even christians be attentive to this, yet what a real Christian can do is understand and be attentive to the authentic meaning of what the text cloth is symbolizing. Taking an excellent look at cutting-facet-day christianity, i myself have not got self belief that maximum christians understand what this skill with any given image stumbled on interior the gospals, or the previous testomony for that remember because of the fact in the event that they did be attentive to, THAN THERE would not BE maximum of distinctive INTERPRETATIONS. With any image that is written interior the Holy Bible, there ought to basically be one authentic meaning. not a distinctive meaning WITH each and each BELIEVER. I do besides the undeniable fact that have self belief that Catholicism knows what it skill to be symbolic for the truthful believer interior the Saviour. that's authentic because of the fact they coach this whilst they show their devotion to the saints besides. occasion could be: On each and all the candles that Catholicism makes use of for a particular saint, the image interior the front of the candle represents the objective in prayer depicting the ability of the saint.......that is SYMBOLIC.
2016-11-02 23:47:33 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
that might be the most irrational thing I've ever heard my life. Cmon man, the truth is, there is NO credible evidence that supports the existence of a god......ZERO.
And.......You claim scientific evidence supports god? what the hell? would you mind STATING what that "Scientific" evidence is? I'm eager to hear it, b/c I've searched and searched and there is none.
"The sooner you can match what's in your head with what's in the real world, the better your gonna feel." Denzel Washington, Training Day
2007-12-11 17:00:18 · answer #5 · answered by Superior Intelligence 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Science is a philosophy created by man. With theories and experiments, they interpret what they feel are facts. And what some, if not most, interpret is that God cannot exist. So in essence, they feel their science is more advanced than God's. And by their theory, the question of God's existance would be contradictory. Because if God did exist, that means men are believing that their science is more advanced than God's which would mean God is not perfect and therefore could not exist. They want God to be able to be "measured" by their science. If God indeed can be measured in some way, again, that would contradict His omnipotent supernatural being and therefore could not exist in the Scientific realm. Does anyone really think God would want to be able to be measured by man? What's wrong with this picture? We are so egocentric that we're betting on our intellect against God's. Though it is difficult to provide "physical" proof of God, Science isn't perfect either. There are many questions and phenomena that we cannot answer. And God will not spend time on those who are unwilling to believe.
Think of it like this: A pouting child asks his dad, "Why??" and his Dad simply replies, "Because I said so".
2007-12-11 16:56:51 · answer #6 · answered by BBHunter 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Did you go to Christian school? Is that why you don't know what science is?
Do you think Mohamed, Manichea, Yaweh ben Yahweh, Buddha, Joseph Smith Jr., & L. Ron Hubbard are fictional?
Because if you are just going by proof of existence, you should be a Scientologist by now.
2007-12-11 16:56:00 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
You're asking the wrong question. Has science proven Christianity to be true? Not really. Is it meant to? If you think so, then the whole reason for faith is negated. Faith is by definition a means to believe in what is not proved by mere logic or science. Both the latter are finite unlike the capacity of faith and works. Which reminds me, faith without works is dead. The opposite is also true.
2007-12-11 16:51:01 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
First, what scientific evidences. Second, it doesn't matter if Christianity is real. I mean, there are like 80% of Americans who believe in god, but they never go to church. Are they Christians? You know as much as they do.
2007-12-11 16:47:24 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
I think the scientific evidence proves that that one girl was correct to think that folks pose as Christians from time to time...
You gave it away when you injected too much sarcasm in your statements about hell.
2007-12-11 16:47:42 · answer #10 · answered by NONAME 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋