I know it was after Jesus died and before Saul became Paul, but does anybody have any idea what the time frame was between those two events?
2007-12-11 09:19:27 · 9 answers · asked by EwtDawg 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Paul's writings were a few decades after Jesus supposedly died.
2007-12-11 09:25:35 · answer #1 · answered by nondescript 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
St Stephen Death
2016-12-12 05:57:48 · answer #2 · answered by corina 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I will set this up first before I answer, so please follow me here......
Jesus was baptized in 27 AD, the reason I know this because.....
(Luke 3:1) Now in the fifteenth year of the reign of Tiberius Caesar, Pontius Pilate being governor of Judea, Herod being tetrarch of Galilee, his brother Philip tetrarch of Iturea and the region of Trachonitis, and Lysanias tetrarch of Abilene,
What year? The fifteenth year of Tiberius Caesar! That is the great thing about history because I can go back in history and tell you what year this was. It was 27 AD! So what is supposed to happen in 27 AD? The Anointing of the Most Holy! Did it happen? Go here….
(Luke 3:21-22) When all the people were baptized, it came to pass that Jesus also was baptized; and while He prayed, the heaven was opened. And the Holy Spirit descended in bodily form like a dove upon Him, and a voice came from heaven which said, “You are My beloved Son; in You I am well pleased.”
Now he died 3 1/2 years later and was crucified in 31 AD. that means that 3 1/2 years later Stephen was stoned in 34 AD because this is the end of the prophecy in Daniel 9:24-27.
2007-12-15 07:58:31 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
Generally, it is believed that Stephen was martyred within a year or two of Jesus' crucifixion.
Paul's transformation from Saul came after persecuting the church, having a vision of Christ, and being taken to the desert for two years prior to his return as a believer, and evangelist.
2007-12-11 09:25:24 · answer #4 · answered by Bobby Jim 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
human beings do have conversions. Saul ought to no longer have prevalent approximately temporal lobe epilepsy, so it replaced into eminently logical of him to end that Jesus replaced into talking to him. i think Paul replaced into trustworthy. His differences of opinion with the Jerusalem church is purely yet another occasion of the schisms that spontaneously upward push up in concept structures that have not have been given any real foundation. It not greater proves that he replaced into anti-Christian than the ninety 5 Theses proves that Luther replaced into anti-Christian. A greater suitable question, i think of, is why might one believe a guy who on no account met Jesus, and easily, replaced into preaching Jesus for 3 years earlier he even stricken to fulfill everybody who knew Jesus. i think the answer to *that* question is that the unique Jesus circulate replaced into all yet worn out for the duration of the 1st Jewish insurrection. yet another available answer to my question is that there replaced into no historic Jesus to start with, and the assumption of a mundane Jesus did no longer take carry till long after Paul, Peter, and James had died. if so, Paul's message might have been as "precise" as everybody's.
2016-11-02 22:37:37 · answer #5 · answered by hinajosa 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
St. Stephen was martyred approximately 35 AD, which is about 2 years after Christ was crucified and rose from the dead. He was the first Christian martyr.
2007-12-11 09:22:49 · answer #6 · answered by Jay 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Depends on how much he smoked, and if it was the good stuff or not...
2007-12-11 09:26:16 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 5⤋
WELL HE HAD TO TAKE TIME TO ROLE A BIG FAT DUBIE -----TORCH IT-----PASS IT AROUND-----FINISH IT ---ID SAY ABOUT 15 MIN
2007-12-11 09:25:00 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 4⤋
just old stories, nothing real
2007-12-11 09:25:41 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 5⤋