English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

36 answers

Have you seen the women around here?

I find it hard to believe for the most part too.

2007-12-11 09:10:51 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5 3

Do I detect a whiff of testosterone in this question?

Lust is the desire to engage in sexual activity, and the word has widened to describe an attitude which involves an intense (and potentially undesirable) need to have something.

At the primal level, this is the species drive to survive beyond the personal lifespan, and could be reasonably classified as an 'animal' instinct, as it is shared by many creatures.

As to women being 'produced' for anything, this is rather absurd.

If you mean 'God' produced women for men's lust, then you are way off any conventional religeous attitudes (and many unconvential one's...), and whatever God may have done, the male and female of the species have their unique differences.

If you mean produced by sexual reproduction, then there's no justification for that, or you can deduce anything you like from it. It would be just as nonsensical.

I take it you are a rather frustrated male who doesn't get enough (any?) of the kind of sex you are looking for or want?

Don't take such petty digs at women to counter your own inadequacies. That's 4 year old level behaviour.

I guess it is possible for some women to have this attitude, but I would think it rare.

From what I am able to observe, I think that most men have little understanding of what sex means to women, and how lust applies to them. I will admit some inadequacies myself, but I am a man, and there is some territory which men will never be able to appreciate in women. A crude but dramatic example would be childbirth, menstruation, and such, but also sex.

Perhaps another way to phrase your question might be "why is it hard for men (you) to admit that women were not produced for your (men's) lust?" might be closer to the mark?

2007-12-11 09:40:39 · answer #2 · answered by TheWizard 3 · 1 0

Because most decent women , don't think like that. Women was put on this Earth to produce. Many good men, have great Respect for women. So I guess it is just the way you look at it. Your view is a hard, negative view. Not to many think the way you do. Men Love women and women Love men. Only with a Prostitute is it refered to as lust.

2007-12-11 09:17:25 · answer #3 · answered by Norskeyenta 6 · 1 0

From a religious point of view: Lust is the one thing that ALL religions set out to destroy.

From a spiritual point of view: Lust is the greatest hindrance to growth, and the cause of all pain.

From an Atheist point of view, who would naturally believe in evolution, lust only serves a race to procreate, and is not specific to males or females. Its goal is making babies and gene fortification, and not pleasure.

I really can't figure where you get your idea that women are made to fulfill men's lust. Maybe you would enlighten us about that.

In love and Light.

2007-12-11 09:15:57 · answer #4 · answered by Babak Kaveh 2 · 0 0

To answer the question on its own terms, it is hard because it is a ludicrous proposition. however, it is impossible to answer the question logically because the question is triply invalid, assuming that women were a) produced, that b) this apparent and unverifiable production was accomplished for only one purpose, and that c) it is only their own intransigence that stands in the way of this being generally acknowledged as true.

2007-12-11 09:17:44 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Really! And, I thought men were made for the lust of women. That is what I always felt about them.

2007-12-11 09:12:24 · answer #6 · answered by Shossi 6 · 7 1

Why is is so hard for you to believe you're a self opinionated bigot?

We like being lusted after (sometimes) bit it's NOT what we were produced FOR.

2007-12-11 09:12:33 · answer #7 · answered by Emma Jean 7 · 8 0

Interesting thought.

How about this one....

In the first six days, each new creation God created even more glorious than before - i.e. land and water came after lightness and darkness, man was made to rule over the animals, etc.

The last thing he created was woman.

2007-12-11 09:18:55 · answer #8 · answered by AutumnLilly 6 · 3 0

Probably the same reason that you don't respect a woman for creating the life that was you.
And if we're going that route, dear, your hand was created to sate your lust not me. You can ask husbands around the world and they will irritably agree.

2007-12-11 09:12:52 · answer #9 · answered by <Sweet-Innocence> 4 · 4 1

i know you're just trolling, but really this question makes no sense. if you are a religious person your holy book, no matter what religion, tells you that women were created to be a helper and companion to man. if you are not religious, you know that the different sexes evolved for the continuation of the species.

2007-12-11 09:18:22 · answer #10 · answered by halloweenie 6 · 2 0

Waa Waa Waa. You've been whining about women this afternoon, just like a little baby (I read your previous message where you were crying about women bosses before it was DELETED). Go drink your milk and play with your rattle (with your attitude you'll be the ONLY one playing with it). And one more thing - you need to brush up on your grammatical knowledge. Capital letters are your friends.

2007-12-11 09:14:05 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 7 0

fedest.com, questions and answers