2007-12-11 08:29:08 · 9 answers · asked by Self 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Maybe
By definition an abstract doesn't have enough evidence to prove itself. But that doesn't rule out evidence to the contrary.
2007-12-11 08:34:44 · answer #1 · answered by tuyet n 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Give us an abstract and let's see.
If you want an absolute one can not definitively prove or disprove anything.
The laws of probability allow that it is possible for you to dissolve at any given time and resolve in China. I wouldn't bet on it though.
2007-12-11 16:47:41 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The God of the Bible is not abstract, he is clearly defined and his acts depicted in the Bible conflict with his mutually exclusive traits left with the limited explanations the Bible gives us.
The Bible is not inerrant, and anyone who believes it is should contact me, I've got a bridge to sell them.
A perfect creator without further definition is an abstract, and is not outside the realm of possibility, although still unobservable.
2007-12-11 16:33:17 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I don't try and disprove anything. Rather, I am concerned with evidence (or lack there of) when I make choices in my life. I don't have to disprove god, the lack of evidence is all I need.
2007-12-11 16:36:32 · answer #4 · answered by atheist 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
So God is an abstract concept now? Good, good. We're getting somewhere...
2007-12-11 16:33:21 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
can you actually prove the abstract?
after all, seeing is believing isnt it?
2007-12-11 16:32:27 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Use an Impressionist.
2007-12-11 16:39:31 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
We can't.
But unless one is trying to convince someone else, there really isn't a reason to.
2007-12-11 16:32:57 · answer #8 · answered by David Carrington Jr. 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The disproof is in the pudding.
2007-12-11 16:32:37 · answer #9 · answered by S K 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋