HP:
http://www.walmart.com/catalog/product.d...
Or Kodak:
http://www.kodak.com/eknec/PageQuerier.j...
I own the kodak. Is the HP worth the price?? I have never used an HP camera before, but it seems like a good option with an 8 mp and 6x zoom for the weight. the kodak has a 6 mp and 10x zoom.
Thanks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2007-12-11 08:26:52 · 6 answers · asked by Oli 3 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Visual Arts ➔ Photography
Sorry the links didnt show up here they are
HP:
http://www.walmart.com/catalog/product.do?product_id=6537105
and Kodak:
http://www.kodak.com/eknec/PageQuerier.jhtml?pq-path=8016&pq-locale=en_US&_requestid=8663
2007-12-11 08:37:54 · update #1
A digital Kodak with the Schneider lens is quite impressive.
Now that I can see your links, I definitely recommend the Kodak. The german formula used in the glass is impressive. I have one...nice, sharp pictures.
2007-12-11 08:31:51 · answer #1 · answered by Mere Mortal 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hi Addie, it depends how you photograph. If you like to shoot interesting creative photos get a Nikon or a Cannon or any other SLR (single lens reflex) digital camera. If all you want to do is shoot pictures in the Instamatic or automatic mode then the Kodak will do just fine for the price. note;some say the higher the pixel number the better the quality of you photos. I say your creative eye trumps all other ideas or formats.
2007-12-11 16:42:01 · answer #2 · answered by *kwah* 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Of these 2 definitely the Kodak, based primarily on the lens, which of course is the most essential part.
2007-12-11 17:22:58 · answer #3 · answered by Dawg 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Kodak.
2007-12-11 17:04:52 · answer #4 · answered by gryphon1911 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Kodak.
2007-12-11 16:58:57 · answer #5 · answered by EDWIN 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neither, I'd rather prefer Canon or Nikon
2007-12-12 03:30:53 · answer #6 · answered by Otaner 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋