English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Proponents of genetically modified foods often claim that GMOs are the only way to feed a hungry world. Can you see how that might be true? Give arguments. Can you see why it might be false?

2007-12-11 07:59:27 · 2 answers · asked by LATEEFAH S 1 in Science & Mathematics Botany

2 answers

Not all places on the planet that has a human population has the proper environment to grow food. A few places in the world are lucky to have a good farming environment. Those areas where the farming environment is poor are areas that are prone to famine. The trick is to find a crop that will grow in those areas. It might be too dry or the season too short or it is too wet or the pests are too numerous or the ground has harsh chemistry or a myriad of other reasons. Also, the unmodified crops that can grow there might not have all of the nutrition needed to sustain life.

So, crops can be modified so that they grow better in the harsh conditions and/or have the nutrients that a person needs. This would help keep people from starving.

Some will argue that we could just grow the food in the plentiful areas and then ship the food to the areas where it is needed. This is done to a degree but it is impractical as a way to completely feed people in these areas. The cost of growing the food, combined with the cost of shipping the food is much more than what the people of these countries can afford to pay. It is an economic drain to try to feed them this way. It might work on the short term but it is not going to keep a region completely fed for a long time. Also, there are environmental concerns with all of the extra fuel that has to be spent to ship the food around the world. Also, this practice can lead to over-farming of certain areas.

2007-12-11 08:10:14 · answer #1 · answered by A.Mercer 7 · 0 0

i ask your self how the insecticides are affecting no longer in basic terms fertility, yet ideas function too. consistent with possibility they worry a extra sharp-minded inhabitants, who with the help of eating organics, keep away from the ideas defuncting insecticides. i assume people who choose for organic and organic care approximately what is going of their physique, and that they are much less possibly to compliment products from the middle cabinets, crammed with the chemical compounds that inhibit neurological applications (like aspartame--which became banned until eventually the enterprise employed Dick Cheney, who used his pull, to get the substance in to public meals) Why is it so difficult to get organic and organic produce from the excellent agri land 50 km from my city? whilst people say all and sundry listed right here are hippies? you will think of people'd be advertising that good produce on the line. The farmers' markets are pathetic. No produce, only crafts and rings...they'd't even sell selfmade jam anymore. over the final many some years with low crop expenses, i ask your self how many mom-and pa farms have been given bought out with the help of super company farms. Now seem how the fee of vegetation skyrocketed, and seem on the ratio of mom-pop vs company farms. strange.

2016-12-10 19:58:37 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers