No the Bible canon was disscussed at the councils of Hippo and Carthage.
2007-12-11 04:23:13
·
answer #1
·
answered by ☼ɣɐʃʃɜƾ ɰɐɽɨɲɜɽɨƾ♀ 5
·
3⤊
0⤋
that isn't authentic in any respect. The Council of Nicea desperate the Nicean Creed and declared Aranism a heresy. The contract of the biblical canon for the Catholic Church became nonetheless a century off. notwithstanding, that's authentic that Eusibius, Constantine's biographer and early Church historian, first began circulating a catalogue of what he considered to be stimulated texts as against what he theory weren't whilst the bishops have been accrued for the council. different bishops began circulating their own lists, and the controversy raged, yet with the help of the time of St. Jerome, and his translation of scriptures into the Latin Vulgate bible contained in the early 5th century, the controversy became especially plenty settled. whilst it is not as stupid as tossing scripture into the air, it is not precisely an exalted, holy spirit ordained technique the two.
2016-10-01 09:02:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I will admit my ignorance about what you mean by "canon" of the Bible. But I guarantee you that the dogma of the trinity needed parts of scripture in order to be formulated. From whence did we get the 3 entities? From the bible. "Son of God" indicates a share in the divinity just as a human son indicates a share in human nature. The father ALONE is the one and ONLY true God is correct as is, since the words "the father" did not refer to the 1st person of the trinity in those days. The dogma of the trinity did not become official until nearly 300 years later. "God, known as the father, ALONE is the one and ONLY true God". In those days, the words "the father" was a term of endearment and respect ONLY. "GOD ALONE is the one and ONLY true God." It's just as pure and simple as that. Trying to make it mean anything more than that is a clever little trick. Proving that Jesus is God is also merely the FIRST step in establishing the dogma of the trinity.
2007-12-11 04:43:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by gismoII 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
It is spelled "Canon"
I do not have a digital version to give you a reference for what you are asking however I can refer you to a book where someone has documented what you seek; written by a former atheist.
Recommend any of Josh McDowell's books. He has written two great biggies recently. "The New Evidence that Demands a Verdict" and "Evidence for Christianity"
An older book he wrote is also good: "He walked among us: Existence for the Historical Jesus"
2007-12-11 04:18:32
·
answer #4
·
answered by onefinefeller 3
·
2⤊
2⤋
Personally, I think the bible would've been a lot more interesting if Conon had had a hand in putting it together...
"Jesus, what is best in life?"
"To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentation of the women!"
2007-12-11 04:15:37
·
answer #5
·
answered by The Reverend Soleil 5
·
4⤊
3⤋
WHERE DOES THIS NONSENSE COME FROM????????
Are they somehow confusing this with the African synods?
Nicaea did not discuss the Canon at all from any documents I have read.
In Christ
Fr. Joseph
2007-12-11 04:22:28
·
answer #6
·
answered by cristoiglesia 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
Turn on Discovery Channel every now and then...just leave it on even in the backround...be brave.
Edit:
There are two known documents regaurding this. One that claims Constantine saw an angel and it told him to do it.
The other the claims Constantine was desparate to find a way to salvage his kingdom.
I believe the latter.
2007-12-11 04:18:46
·
answer #7
·
answered by Blame Amy 5
·
2⤊
3⤋
THANK YOU!!! This is my pet peeve.
Nowhere is there such documentation....the canon of Scripture was not discussed at Nicea.
2007-12-11 04:15:29
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
Because I say it was.
2007-12-11 04:16:27
·
answer #9
·
answered by plastik punk -Bottom Contributor 6
·
2⤊
3⤋