The best idea is to go to a library and read actual scientific journals.
But few will do that. Mostly they will go to websites.
So go to places that talk about science, not politics. Are the written by climatologists? Do they quote data and the scientific literature or do they talk about politics? You should be able to figure that out for yourself.
Here are my personal favorites, particularly the first and the last.
http://profend.com/global-warming/
http://www.ucsusa.org/global_warming/science/
http://www.realclimate.org
"climate science from climate scientists"
http://environment.newscientist.com/channel/earth/dn11462
2007-12-10 16:47:52
·
answer #1
·
answered by Bob 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Fact is - the sun is dropping in temperature every second but until it becomes cool enough for another ice age to form we might have a problem but try this extremely scientific method of the worlds ice melting (take into account the warmer it gets the more water evapourates during the weather cycle too).... put a few ice cubes in a glass- (these ice cubes represent the massive huge floating ice on the poles) -then fill to the brim with water (this water represents...well the earths water level.) Apply warmth... does the water lever rise as the ice melts?
2016-05-22 23:24:32
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Easy to find Polarized opinions. I've ready a lot of material and discussed it in depth with friends.
Stay away from sites which are polarized to 1 side or another.
The topic is too complex to just believe in 1 side and then conduct research to prove your point.
Try to find middle ground sites that evaluate the claims of both sides.
2007-12-10 14:57:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by John S 7
·
1⤊
3⤋
Just don't go to wikipedia, I'm positive you know people just go on that website and the idiots just randomly edit it.
2007-12-10 14:56:25
·
answer #4
·
answered by RONNYBOO! 2
·
2⤊
1⤋
Go to the library, get a great book called State of Fear by: Michael Crichton; great story, heavily researched and footnoted. (The lefties hate it because it exposes their agenda)
2007-12-10 14:57:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
5⤋
either side could produce convincing evidence to support their argument. do some research and find out for yourself.
2007-12-10 14:55:05
·
answer #6
·
answered by momontheedge 4
·
1⤊
4⤋
those who take it serously are also confused lot !
2007-12-10 15:17:16
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
stopglobalwarming.org
2007-12-10 14:56:19
·
answer #8
·
answered by hello :) 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
GLOBAL WARMING IS SO STUPID, I MEAN THEY'VE GOT SCIENTIST STUDYING KANGAROO FARTS, WOW....
2007-12-10 14:55:01
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
7⤋