Some folks seem to think this would be a great idea:
-------------------------------------------
http://www.worthynews.com/news/newsweek-washingtonpost-com-postglobal-needtoknow-2007-04-want_middle_east_stability_mov-html/
--------------------------------------------------------------
Do YOU think this is a good idea...and if so, why??
Bad idea?....why??
2007-12-10 13:41:32 · 20 answers · asked by PAUL R 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
The UN is a 100 times more likely to move to Rome than anywhere else in the world.
However, that would be one of the biggest mistakes the UN could made if it were to move to Iraq. They would have bomb threats all the time.
Up Date:
blondie, interesting would be an understatement.
2007-12-12 12:35:50 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
your statements are extremely biased and i hope no one is reading them as facts. the US has played power trips with the UN all along. the UN is an international body and it is meant to represent all of the nations of the world, but the US only wants it to represent US interests. if the UN does things that seem "anti-capitalist" that may be because not every nation is capitalist, and the UN needs to reflect that. if the UN does things that seem "anti-semetic" that may be because not everyone is jewish and not everyone agrees that jews should get everything they demand. and the UN gave them israel for crying out loud! and to suggest that the UN praises terrorists over everyone else is pure unsupported rhetoric. it is the US government that tends to hate the UN and works against the UN. if the US government was more cooperative, they would recognize the need for the UN to act in the interest of ALL nations, and not just the US. should the headquarters be moved? well, it might benefit the UN to be in a country that isn't constantly working to undermine its power. however, keep in mind that the UN is in New York City, a very international city. i doubt that the majority of residents of new york agree with your views on the UN. and i agree with dave - "anti-semantic" was good for a laugh. sorry "m1nus", i clicked "thumbs down" when i meant to click "thumbs up". obviously, i agree with you.
2016-05-22 23:07:56 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Won't happen until the region is a heckuva lot more stable than it is now. Last I heard, they packed up and LEFT Iraq.
Historically, the US was the genesis of the United Nations, beginning with the League of Nations.
New York is considered the Capital of the World. The UN being there is traditional, and in our own national best interest.
2007-12-10 13:50:03 · answer #3 · answered by lmn78744 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It would clear the way for the neo-cons in the USA to form their one world government under the banner of paxAmericana and, as Bush Senior put it, a New World Order, all the while pointing at the UN to distract us from the true threat.
2007-12-10 14:16:06 · answer #4 · answered by capekicks 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Appropriate.
Babylon - in Revelation "Babylon the Great" represents the world empire of false worship and is doomed to be turned on by the nations and destroyed.
UN - blasphemously called themselves "The political expression of God's KIngdom on Earth" - is the image of the wild beast in Revelation and will be a primary part of the turning on Babylon.
2007-12-10 13:50:32 · answer #5 · answered by eliz_esc 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes , they should . It is a good idea because the UN is a body dedicated totally against the will of the LORD our God. ( YHWH) Everything they do smacks of anti- christ like, politically correct, self serving evil. They belong in Babylon. I say we should boot them out of the US, no matter where they go.
2007-12-10 13:51:57 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Great idea!!!
Think of all the possible uses for that property in Manhattan!
And that way you won't have the diplomats in Manhattan who figure they can park where ever they like since they have immunity and don't have to pay the tickets.
2007-12-10 13:45:33 · answer #7 · answered by Amy W 6 · 6⤊ 0⤋
Please get that corrupt org. off the shores of the U.S.A. and onto the shores of likewise corrupt nations,( Russia,Saudi Arabia, China, Mexico, etc.....) and allow the U.S.A. to use all of those billon of dollars that they prop the U.N. up with, to finance a better way of life for it's (the U.S.A's) population.
2007-12-10 13:53:42 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why don't we just build them a nice place in Greenland, so they can actually watch with their own eyes the melting of our planet by global warming. Maybe then, they'll actually do something about it.
2007-12-10 13:52:31 · answer #9 · answered by Another Guy 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Good, get them out of America,
but
that would mean we are very close to the end, since the anti-christ would be on the way fast if that happened
2007-12-10 13:45:06 · answer #10 · answered by You may be right 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋