English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Michael Vick did a terrible thing. He hung, drowned, tortured and forced dogs to fight.

Now, I ask you, how is that any worse than what our meat industry does to beef, pork, fowl, and fish?

As consumers of such "food", are we not endorsing cruelty to animals?

2007-12-10 12:39:35 · 9 answers · asked by http://www.wrightlawnv.com 4 in Food & Drink Other - Food & Drink

9 answers

Killing an animal for consumption is completely different from torturing an animal just to get your rocks off. I can't believe that you aren't intelligent enough to figure THAT one out!

2007-12-16 07:35:08 · answer #1 · answered by RobinLu 5 · 0 0

I don't consider it much worse. I believe most view it as worse because the animal is being tortured for sport as opposed as being used for food. In other words since they have enjoyment in the act of cruelty they are looked down as vicious. It is like a person who shot someone for self defense and someone who shot some random person on the street for fun. The end result is the same but one person took enjoyment in the slaughter which was pointless. The other is happy they were able to defend themselves but it was not something they did out of enjoyment but for survival. Many meat-eaters believe they need meat to survive or just plain love the taste but they do not see what is happening behind closed doors. The people that work for the company do it to make money for their means of survival. Michael Vick does not need to torture dogs to live.

2016-05-22 22:54:26 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

Livestock destined to be food is not hung, drowned, tortured, and forced to fight. The animals are humanely killed.

I see a WORLD of difference between me, a carnivore and dog-lover, and Vick, a greedy dog fighter.

2007-12-10 12:43:52 · answer #3 · answered by Sugar Pie 7 · 5 1

Michael Vick doesn't deserve to be compared to butchers and hunters. Read your own question: we do not torture, hang, drown cows and pigs. What Vick did was cause beautiful animals excrutiating pain and fear. He is one of the worst peopleon this earth.

2007-12-10 12:45:37 · answer #4 · answered by Ellie 5 · 1 2

you don't have to buy factory farmed meat. You can buy humanely killed animals. I don't think any dog fighting could be seen as humane.

2007-12-10 12:46:18 · answer #5 · answered by jautomatic 5 · 1 2

You weirdo wanker you! Get back to your cage & stop bothering respectable people. Ten to one on you're a PESTA person.

2007-12-10 13:06:31 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

YES AND I HOPE HE ROTS IN HELL AND DEMONS EAT HIS INTESTINES, HEAD, EVERYTHING BCUZ HE IS A BASSTARD AND I HATE HIM AND HE'S A JERK AND I HATE HATE HATE HIM. I CAN'T IMAGINE SOMEONE TORTURING ANIMALS LIKE THAT. WHO IS THAT HEARTLESS???

2007-12-10 13:34:30 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

no, ur right, we should let VIck go...

and cows would be extinct if we didn't eat them

2007-12-10 12:46:09 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

stop trying to be an "intellectual".

you are an idiot

2007-12-10 12:47:37 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers