English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

4 answers

somewhere near 400 depending on your weight, running or swimming hard is a much more efficent way of losing weight, do that if you can.

By efficent I mean a pain/time to benefit ratio is better in running and swimming than in walking, even uphill.

2007-12-10 10:19:29 · answer #1 · answered by Nate 6 · 0 0

for occasion an occasion, permit’s use the a hundred and fifty pound lady and characteristic her walk one hour at 3.0 miles according to hour. So, a million.5 X a hundred and fifty X a million hour provides us 225 energy burned. If that lady is often inactive, she desires 1500 energy according to day to maintain her present day weight. If she walks one hour thrice a week, she burns one greater 675 energy a week. So, she will have the capacity to lose a pound in approximately 5 weeks. (A pound is 3500 energy.) So, including this thrice a week walk will, via the years, help her to lose better than a pound a month, that's a very risk-free and powerful fee of weight alleviation. of direction, reducing caloric intake will help drop extra pounds greater at once, yet don’t circulate under a million,2 hundred energy an afternoon or you ought to purely shrink your metabolism. . to maintain up with your distance and time strolling, i desire to advise the digital top rate Pedometer.

2016-11-15 05:00:04 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

i would say about 500 around, because i walk for about 30 mins and i burn about 250...

2007-12-10 10:22:26 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

at an incline of 0, I would guess about 300

2007-12-10 10:21:45 · answer #4 · answered by momontheedge 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers