Creationists, can you explain your view of evolutionary theory?

Question

If you believe evolution is false, that presumes knowing what it's all about. So, in your own words, explain how you think evolution works, according to evolutionary theory.

Answer 1

as the enivorment forces change then creatures chance through the process of mutations . this is considered to be a long stretched out process. by the way there is no junk DNA. it was discovered this year that there needs to be "junk " to seperate the amount of active amount of DNA. they figured out if all the active DNA was piled up one on another it would not function. wish had saved the article from Discovery science.

Answer 2

It may sound strange to you, but i believe in both.
Yes, yes, i know the bible said this and that about how God created the universe and the whole thing but, i believe that God created science and since God is all powerful and all-everything, really, i don't believe it too far-fetched to think that God created evolution. Though, i am quite skeptical of the theory that i evolved from a chimp, in all honesty.

Answer 3

At the risk of well, being at risk, here's my thoughts on evolution. I believe God to be the Ultimate scientist, mathematician, geologist, and biologist. I believe that He uses evolution to create aspects of life that do not need His image. Therefore, while man is on a completely different branch of His creation (and so needs more direct supervision), the rest of the living creatures can evolve by themselves. There, make fun at will.

Answer 4

Ok I will first there were those itie bitty crawly things then there were fishes that eventually grew legs and crawled out on the land ant turned into dinosaurs for a hundred million years then there were creepy things that turned into other creepy thing and then turned into monkeys great apes and men and ther grew up to become Christians and screw up the entire theory. And that's all.

Answer 5

Dude, by definition, creationists don't believe in evolution, so they cannot explain it! You should have phrased your question more clearly, although I'm sure that it served your purpose to incite a "flame" war!

Answer 6

My view of evolution is the same as yours, except that mine was initiated by God and yours wasn't. Everything after that is scientific fact.

(Theistic Evolution)

Answer 7

I predict one actually decent answer from a Christian and they will not be a Creationist. I find it very interesting that no one will answer your question. I would guess that this is because none of them have actually studied evolution. They just take their Parent and/or Pastor's word that it is false.

Answer 8

I am a Christian. Evolution could possibly make sense if you don't believe what God has told you. For one thing, the earth can only be around 6,000 years old because, in the beginning, God tells us that there were no deaths before the fall of man. Adam and Eve brought death into the world. If the universe was millions of years old, there would have been deaths before Adam and Eve disobeyed God. Even Jesus believed this. He is known as the man who did not fall.

Romans 5:12-21 (New American Standard Bible)

12Therefore, just as through one man sin entered into the world, and death through sin, and so death spread to all men, because all sinned--

13for until the Law sin was in the world, but sin is not imputed when there is no law.

14Nevertheless death reigned from Adam until Moses, even over those who had not sinned in the likeness of the offense of Adam, who is a type of Him who was to come.

15But the free gift is not like the transgression. For if by the transgression of the one the many died, much more did the grace of God and the gift by the grace of the one Man, Jesus Christ, abound to the many.

16The gift is not like that which came through the one who sinned; for on the one hand the judgment arose from one transgression resulting in condemnation, but on the other hand the free gift arose from many transgressions resulting in justification.

17For if by the transgression of the one, death reigned through the one, much more those who receive the abundance of grace and of the gift of righteousness will reign in life through the One, Jesus Christ.

18So then as through one transgression there resulted condemnation to all men, even so through one act of righteousness there resulted justification of life to all men.

19For as through the one man's disobedience the many were made sinners, even so through the obedience of the One the many will be made righteous.

20The Law came in so that the transgression would increase; but where sin increased, grace abounded all the more,

21so that, as sin reigned in death, even so grace would reign through righteousness to eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.

Answer 9

All those chunks of deactivated amphibian genes hanging around my junk DNA were put there to tempt the faithless. In fact DNA itself, with its forensic landscape of the evolutionary process is just Satan's mirage. There is no DNA, only faith.

Answer 10

Evolution is a lie. it says that humans slowly evolved over tens of thousands of years. The Earth can not be tens of thousands of years old. Only people that refuse to open their eyes and see the truth can believe in it.
Here is a small part of that truth...

Evolution teaches that we came from animals.
Evolution teaches that animals came from Amphibians.
Evolution teaches that Amphibians come from sea life.
Sea life from single-cell life.
Single cell life from chemicals.
Chemicals from rocks that were rained on for years.
Conclusion, all live came from rocks.
Which is more likely, that an intelligent created life, or that nothing did, and what about bio-genesis?

The Evolutionist base their belief in Evolution on the fact that “Micro-evolution” is true. What they do not tell is that there are 6 different meanings to the word Evolution, and only “Micro-evolution” has ever been observed.
1) Cosmic Evolution (Never Observed) The creation of time, space and matter. (The Big Bang)
2) Chemical Evolution (Never Observed) Production of heavy elements from hydrogen.
3) Steller Evolution (Never Observed) The formation of stars, planets, and solar systems.
4) Organic Evolution (Never Observed) Life from random chemical.
5) Macro-Evolution (Never Observed) One animal mutating into another.
6) Micro-Evolution. (Observed) Slight changes in a species. A better name for this would be “Adaptation”

The Sun is Shrinking.
o.1% would mean a half-life of 10,000 years, so 10,000 years ago, it would be twice as big as it is now, 20,000 years, 4 times as big, 30,000 years, 8 times as big...
The inverse square law means the gravity would be 64 times then what it is now. What would it be in 65 million years?

Carbon dating is based on 3 assumptions that can not be proven.
1. The amount of carbon-14 in the body is the same as in the air.
2. The amount that was in it at the time of death is the same as in the air today.
3. Nothing has removed or washed-out any of the carbon-14
4. The rate of decay is a constant.
1,3,and 4 are assumptions. There is no way to prove them.
2 was proven wrong at lest twice, never proven right. The amount of Carbon-14 in the air is still increasing.

The Geological Columns.
Evolutionist believe that the Geological Columns prove that the Earth is millions of years old because each layer is a different age. What they do not tell is that the layers are not even. There could be 50 layers in 1 spot, 30 layers a mile away. And 80 layers another mile.
Also they do not tell that there are trees and animals buried in the layers crossing dozens of layers and some time upside down.
There is only 2 possibilities for this...
1) The plant or animal was there for centuries waiting to be buried before it decayed. Many of the trees would have to balance upside-down, and many animal, such as whales, would have to balance on their tail fins against wind, rain, and vibrations from other animals walking/running for centuries.
2. The plant or animal was buried quickly. This would require that they be under water since only water makes dirt settle in layers quickly.

The Van-Allen Radiation Belt.

The Earths Magnetic field is slowly getting weaker. It has a half-life of 1450 years. This means that it is losing ½ of its strength every 1450 years.
Time Magnetic strength
2,000 AD 1
555 AD 2
900BC 4
2,350BC 8
3,800BC 16
About 6000 years ago (The time of Genesis) it would have been about 16 times as strong as it is now. A magnet field of that power would stop the venom of snakes from being harmful.
About 4000 to 4500 years ago (The time of The Great Flood) it would have been about 8 times as strong as now.
About 2000 years ago (The time Of Jesus, The Christ) it would have been about 3 times as strong as now.
Now, lets see how strong it would have been just 50,000 years ago.
5,250BC 32
6,700BC 64
---
50,200BC-68,719,476,736

Sixty eight Billion, Seven hundred and nineteen Million, Four hundred and seventy six thousand, seven hundred and thirty six times what is it now.

What would it have been 65,000,000 years ago?

Many Evolutionist claim that the reason the Earths magnetic field is getting weaker is because it is reversing. They say that it has reversed several times in history. If this was true then that would mean that every time it reversed, there would be a time of neutral magnetic field. This would mean that there was no magnetic field at these times. If there is no magnetic field, then there is no Van-Allen Radiation belt, and all the X-Rays, Gamma-Rays, and other forms of radiation from the sun would hit the earth directly, destroying all life on the land, and making the oceans hot enough to boil cooking all life in the waters. Evolution would have to start all over after every reversal.

How do stars form?
There are many ideas about this subject, but no way to know for sure.
Some believe that stars form from clouds of gases collecting together. As they compress closer together, they get hotter and finally ignite into a star.
This has been proven to be impossible. As the gases collect, there would be 2 forces at work. The gravity pulling them together, and the pressures pushing them apart. The pressure pushing them apart would be between 50 and 100 times stronger then the gravity pulling them together. This would be like a balloon inflating itself from the gravity of the air inside pulling more air in with no help from a outside source.
Another possible explanation would be that a star or supernova explodes close to the gas cloud.
The problem with this idea is that the shock wave would not compress the gases, it would sweep then away and scatter them even more then they are so that they can not collect. Look at a leaf blower.
Another possible explanation is that 20 stars explode at the same time all around this gas cloud.
The problem with this idea is that 20 stars would have to die for 1 to form. 400 stars would have to die for those 20 to exist, and 8,000 would have to die for those 400 to exist, and 160,000 to make them. How far back can it go, and how did the first generation of stars from?

The several stages of evolution have all been proven to be wrong.
1) Lucy.
A 3 foot skeleton of a chimp, the “evidence” that she was becoming human was her knee joint, which was found more then a mile away, and over 200 feet in the earth.
2) Heidelberg Man.
Built by a jaw bone that was considered to be quite human.
3) Nebraska Man.
Built from a pigs tooth
4) Piltdown Man.
The jaw was a modern ape
5) Peking Man.
Lived 500,000 years ago, but no remains were ever found.
6) Neanderthal Man.
Old Man with arthritis.
7) New Guinea man.
? I have never been able to find any info except that this one was found in New Guinea.
8) Gro-Magnon Man.
Skeletal Structure is exactly the same as modern man.
Would anyone care to claim that I am a "dumb" creationist.
I am actually writing a book that uses ONLY facts that been repeatedly proven to prove that evolution is scientificly impossible.
P.S. The only diploma Darwin got other then Highschool was a docteran of divinity..
Your GREAT SCIENTIST was not a scientist at all, he was a preacher. And his "proof" was bird beaks.