Is this further proof man made global warming is all about taxes?

Question

http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,22896334-2,00.html

I am not going to post all the links that showing there isn't this massive consence that global warming is man made or it is over blown by various scienctists.

I just look at who is making money off this.
Al Gore and his carbon credits
Now taxing babies

So tell me again about the same science that can't even predict the weather for this weekend is the one that is 100% sure we are all doomed if we don't believe Al Gore and worship him and give him our offerings to the man-made global warming gods.

http://personals.galaxyinternet.net/tunga/OSGWD.htm
If you look you will note there is your peer review.

Answer 1

Take the money out of global warming, and it wouldn't exist anymore. No one would have any interest.

Global warming is very profitable.

Answer 2

i'm nevertheless a dash sceptical, notwithstanding if i actual care approximately our wild places. I do although think of that we ought to continuously take the prospect heavily. The info proves that organic cycles of climate take place on a grand scale. there have been as quickly as lions, hippos and elephants wandering the united kingdom nation-state, approximately a hundred and twenty,000 years in the past. That improve into an interglacial heat spell. the ingredient that's no longer disputed, is that those issues take place for sure, inspite of each little thing the Scottish nation-state is full of glacial helpful properties. although, the info ability that our added contribution to worldwide warming is making it take place at a speedier fee than existence can take care of. we are talking approximately climate substitute happening in many years, quite than spanning centuries or hundreds of years. organic international has coped with climate substitute incredibly properly interior the previous. woodlands and grasslands can flow at their snails %., to maintain music of the situations that tournament them. at present there are added subjects. we've our organic international trapped in wallet that are surrounded by ability of farmland. The organic "corridors" are long previous. organic international charities are doing their maximum suitable to make our wild places extra joined up. If climate substitute keeps as that's and there is not any area for issues to bypass, then we are able to lose lots. besides, i think of my important situation is that i do no longer choose it to be genuine.

Answer 3

Yeah, these people are all about taxes:

"Former Republican House Speaker Newt Gingrich challenged fellow conservatives to stop resisting scientific evidence of global warming"

"National Review (the most prestigious conservative magazine) published a cover story this past week calling on conservatives to shake off denial and get into the climate policy debate"

"Pat Robertson (very conservative Christian leader) 'It is getting hotter and the ice caps are melting and there is a build up of carbon dioxide in the air. We really need to do something on fossil fuels.”

"I believe there is now more than enough evidence of climate change to warrant an immediate and comprehensive - but considered - response. Anyone who disagrees is, in my view, still in denial."

Ford Motor Company CEO William Clay Ford, Jr.

"The science of global warming is clear. We know enough to act now. We must act now."

James Rogers, CEO of Charlotte-based Duke Energy.

Scientists aren't 100% sure, only 99%. Want to bet your future well being on a 1% shot?

Answer 4

The true cost of many things in our current economic systems are not recognized. The impact on the planet has a huge effect on our quality of life, and even more important, the future.

Why shouldn't there be a tax on things that have a negative effect as deterrent, with those tax monies then used as incentives for positive actions?

Human over population is the root of most of our problems with the environment.

Would you rather have a one child policy imposed on you like the Chinese?


Please consider watching this little video...

Answer 5

Wow, this sounds like a political rant rather than a question. If the question is whether folks with like thinking can confirm your conspiracy theories, then let others comment on that.

If you want to get opinions on climate change that are based on grounded climate data, then your best sources are scientific journals that are peer reviewed to ensure sound data and methods. Sound summaries can be found in Scientific American, Science, National Geographic and other popular magazines that have editorial processes above reproach.

Long-term climate change and its prediction are not linked to yesterday's weather or next week's weather. Have you taken some time to read from original sources about data? Might be a good place to start if you want to have a grounded opinion.

Answer 6

I do believe in Global warming, just not as the big "experts" claim how it is going.

I personally believe that earth is going through its natural cycles (like breathing in and out, cold then hot). Along with that we have contributed some, but more than that it is naturally traped sources of methan that are being released by a 1/2 degree overall change that is causing alot more along with cows and other rumens.

Answer 7

I see if we don't believe like the AGW believers we are conspiracy theriosts? Besides this article is from Australia, but I can see where America could jump on this kind of craziness, if this goes any further.

Answer 8

Oh surprise, surprise!!! Why am I not in shock over this article. Why don't we tax our young people for their very existence? Breathing, bowel movements, home sites that they don't own yet, anything else that we can think of???
INSANITY!!!

Answer 9

GE-global extortion (in the name of science).

Answer 10

Oh I almost forgot for a second that the US is the land of conspiracy theories, especially regarding taxes and world governments.

Thanks for reminding me.