2007-12-09 13:44:58 · 21 answers · asked by realchurchhistorian 4 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Prechorin -- If I really said what your idea was, I would be reported and my question deleted. You are horrible.
2007-12-09 13:55:33 · update #1
No, it will be a marked lack of violent crime thanks to there not being a surplus of unwanted and hence unloved children being brought into the world.
edit: I guess that's why the book "Freakonimics" has sold over 3 million copies then, as that was one of it's main conclusions. I'd recommend that you read it, but you don't seem like the kind of person capable of learning anything.
2007-12-09 13:47:44 · answer #1 · answered by perchorin 5 · 6⤊ 3⤋
Abortion isn't "euthanasia" that's aborting a fetus. combating the shape of a clump of cells. Terminating the being pregnant. easily, this is the main beautiful germ interior the full "abortion debate." the concept some individuals are no longer able to hold close that a fetus isn't a guy or woman. that's a fetus. this is variety of tragic, easily, that interestingly this is the only subject which tingles the emotion of specific human beings. while there is so, so, so very many pressing subject concerns crowding in on us on an well-known basis. P.S. you do comprehend abortion is criminal - perfect?
2016-11-15 02:23:26 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
One can only hope. A friend of mine, because of a medical screw-up during surgery, ended up in a coma with almost no brain activity. Her family took her off the respirator, and she lived for two weeks. Because they could not have her life peacefully ended, as we would do with a dog or cat, she basically had to die of dehydration with no feeding tube. They're devout Catholics, by the way.
This country is so screwed up--oh, we can't have euthanasia--let's just starve people slowly to death. Let's let terminal patients die slow, painful deaths. Oh, and no medical marijuana to ease the pain, either.
2007-12-09 13:49:54 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 1⤋
I certainly hope so. I don't want to lay on a bed brain dead for ten years being fed through a tube. I am not pro-choice by the way. Euthanasia has nothing to do with pro-choice.
2007-12-09 13:49:34 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 2⤋
I could only hope for euthanasia. Who wants to be 85, bedridden and slowly dieing of prostate cancer while not being able to remember who your children are? People were not meant to live like that and I see life at that point as punishment.
2007-12-09 13:49:46 · answer #5 · answered by Marvin -Retired- 4 · 7⤊ 1⤋
Yes
and not just proabortion people will be 'harvested' by those who advocate only'life worthy of living"be permitted to survive and thaose that are "social and resource drains" be 'put down'
2007-12-10 10:13:29 · answer #6 · answered by James O 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's not the age it's the quality of life. I can assure you that there were a few times I felt so ill that if a Dr. told me I was dying I would have asked him to kill me rather than endure any more of that.
2007-12-09 14:00:34 · answer #7 · answered by Benji 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Yes, and months of debilitating, excruciating pain accompanied by the inability to go to the toilet by yourself or form a basic sentence will be what you'll get.
Have fun with that!
2007-12-09 13:56:08 · answer #8 · answered by mam2121 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Tell you what - if I got to the point where every day of my life was a pain-filled struggle that had me bedridden with no hope of it ever getting any better, I would HOPE that someone would do the humane thing and end my life painlessly instead of letting me suffer.
2007-12-09 13:48:34 · answer #9 · answered by Nandina (Bunny Slipper Goddess) 7 · 6⤊ 1⤋
I do supprot Euthanasia in extreme cases, actually.
Does that make me a bad person?
2007-12-09 13:49:32 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋