I took the test here was done in 20 mins was given 100% and it didn't test me on anything that would benefit me as a driver. When i took my test in England it was an hour long, the pass rate is 45-50% and reqiuired professional lessons @$20 hr.. Is there a possible link between the fact that driving is the biggest killer of teenagers in america, over alcohol, drugs, guns etc, and the basic way we teach and test them to drive? Shouldn't the test be more comprehensive, to give them a better chance of surviving into their twenties, should we change the way we teach them in our schools? Or should we follow California and raise the age limit to learn to drive for our kids from 15/16 to 17/18?
2007-12-09
06:18:40
·
6 answers
·
asked by
Hercules38
1
in
Cars & Transportation
➔ Safety