We found bits and pieces of all sorts of equipment that was part of the list of weapons of mass destruction. We found chemical munitions being use for IED's, but they were not complete, so didn't do anything. I've heard rumor's of bomb makers getting their hands on old chemical munitions and poisoning themselves when they tried to open them.
You have to realize one thing about Iraq, they've been fighting wars for over 35 years! There are thousands of fighting positions, hundreds of old bases, and ammo bunkers dating back to the 1960s. We found World War 2 German landmines near our base, and the area is littered with millions of anti-aircraft shells, just abandoned by their crews.
It wouldn't surprise me if we had found all the WMDs and just never realized they are tropheys sitting in front of some Colonels Headquarters in Iraq! Those old oil drums sitting in front of your guard post may be filled with Nerve Gas, but no one ever went out there after the base put up it's wire obstacles. It won't suprise me if they start turning up after the US starts pulling the troops out, and the Iraqi's move back into their old bases.
2007-12-08 20:05:27
·
answer #1
·
answered by John S 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Apparently there are none in Iraq now or they are very well hidden. They have found old munition canisters with traces of sarin gas in them.
But we dragged our feet for so long, Saddam knew we were coming and he was able to delay the inevetible long enough to smuggle his weapons out of Iraq, probably to Syria.
Do I know this to be fact? No I don't but he used deadly chemical weapons on the Kurds in N. Iraq.
2007-12-08 19:53:05
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
I'm sure that the regime under Saddam had WMD. He used them on the Kurds, in South Iraq and some on Iran during his war with Iran from 1980 to 1990. I think they have hidden them so well and only a few people do or did know the whereabouts. As the story goes, he used political prisoners to get them to the hiding places and than they got killed to silence them. One day WMD will be found and I hope they don't do any harm to the environment and people................
2007-12-08 20:02:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
No, the only reason why the Bush Administration went there in the first place was to get their hands on money from oil. There are no mass destructions weapons in Iraq, & the whole war has put our economy and country in debt, and a downfall.
But, I still hope for the best for the troops & innocent Iraqi civilians.
2007-12-08 19:59:07
·
answer #4
·
answered by xloverly 3
·
1⤊
3⤋
There are weapons of mass destruction in Iran and Russia maybe. Lol.
2007-12-08 19:50:37
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Saddam use to have them no doubt about it, not nuclear though, but mostly chemical and biological as he had used them before with his Scud missiles.
But after the war in n1998, iraq most probably had already lost most of, if not all of its capabilities to produce them. Their facility was all bombed.
I don't think anyone knows how much remaining stockpile he as after the war, but it doesn't seems like its still in Iraq or exist anymore by 2003
2007-12-08 19:59:22
·
answer #6
·
answered by Hornet One 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
No, and No, if you are talking about nucluear bombs able to reach the USA, but YES, YES, if you are speaking of other weapons, like germ warfare. I'm an ex-nam dude, and I know it's possible. We Americans have to stay strong, and basically 'assholes' to survive. Most countries are jealous of us, the way we live, the way we believe that life can be good, and fun. We love having kids, and grandkids, and even greatgrandkids, other countries, people look at that as a burden. They are envious of us, Americans, and that's why we are constantly attacted. Just my thoughts, ex Air Force dude. Ron
2007-12-08 20:03:30
·
answer #7
·
answered by ronscouch 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
often a weapon which will kill hundreds or maybe hundreds. So issues like nuclear warheads and poisonous brokers like nerve gas, poison gases etc. those weapons might properly be added by ability of plane or missiles and don't ought to inevitably be an instantaneous hit to reason deaths. in actuality a weapon designed to reason massive deaths or injury with one launch and in all probability durable consequences. everyday bombs and such might reason hundreds of deaths however the component of impact is often quite small the place as WMD often might disguise a lots extra suitable section. So a classic bomb might desire to disguise countless undred ft a WMD might disguise countless miles (or maybe an entire city).
2016-10-01 05:18:04
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Are you still in the last century or have you been sleeping for the last 6 years. Do you mean Iran because the story is trying to repeat itself. Its very ironical. If they had weapons of mass destruction they would have used it to defend themselves.
I can see Mahal is a christians because christians like him love violence the kind Bush uses.
2007-12-08 19:52:52
·
answer #9
·
answered by observer 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
The Iraqi government keeps it top secret, just like the United States does.
The set points would be at Major Airports, governmental facilities, and Ole Ama's camel farm.
2007-12-08 19:52:35
·
answer #10
·
answered by Agent319.007 6
·
0⤊
1⤋