English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-12-08 15:48:57 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

to those who've commented on the number of times this question has been asked; I just wanted to point out that I haven't been on in awhile. That's probably why I haven't seen any of those questions..LOL ;]

2007-12-08 16:48:55 · update #1

20 answers

seeing it tomorrow. I'll add on what I thought about it afterward =)
EDIT: It's one of the best movies ever!!!! But if you hate cliff hangers don't' go. It leaves up a BIG cliffhanger so now I'm going to try to read the book again. The movie only has parts 1 and 2 of the first book no part 3 (which I've heard is the most exciting part) There was way more violence then I expected and the monkey is pretty creepy too. It a great movie if you like either fantasy or sci-fi or both. It's captivating and you won't get bored but not to the point where it will give you nightmares. I rate it a must see. 3.5 stars(out of 4 stars) or 2 thumbs up. I haven't fully read the book so I can't say if it's like Eragon where they totally screwed everything up but it made me want to read the books and I can't wait to see the next movie,( I can bet anything there's going to be a next one). I dint' see how it can possibly offended anyone (okay I can but it's very stupid and to difficult to explain in writing but I can tell you) The actors are amzing to. It's a great movie. Go see it. I'll own it when it comes to DVD

2007-12-08 15:57:11 · answer #1 · answered by ٠Golden Eyes٠ 5 · 1 0

Harry Potter was controversial within the religious community at one time. It presented magic as real. This bothered religious conservatives.

The Lord of the Rings is heralded as a Christian metaphor, showing the triumph of good over evil. It also presents magic as real.

You don't need to see a movie to encounter atheism. Just walk into any American high school biology class. Look at any recent Supreme Court ruling.

I am sorry, but you needn't worry about this movie or any other promoting atheism. The atheists have already won. The view that nature just "is", and all of reality is "natural", has overtaken the conscience mind of the world. Christians are anachronistic in this culture, Hebrews are archaic, and Moslems are destructive fanatics. Such is the buzz.

If you are concerned that this film will add fuel to this fire, you are probably correct. But, the fire is already blazing. Our Christian nation is no longer so.

The only persons who can protect young people from atheism are their parents. Those who fail to do so have no one to blame but themselves.

Art and fiction have assaulted theism for a very long time. Hemingway. Lenny Bruce. The Beatles and Led Zepplin. Madonna. Isaac Asimov.

Science has assaulted theism. Darwin. Einstein.

Politicians have assaulted theism, from Thomas Jefferson to Richard Nixon to George Bush.

Those who say they are Christian and those who say they believe in God are by far in the majority, but when the chips are down, when reality goes "all in", we will see that the grain is far outnumbered by the chaff. Very few will have the nerve of the Columbine girl who, when given the opportunity to save her own life by rejecting God and His Messiah, refused and suffered death as a result. Most will choose life.

If you have a genuine concern about cultural influences that are anti Christian and anti theism, you are too late. That war has already been won by the atheists.

2007-12-08 16:26:36 · answer #2 · answered by zealot144 5 · 0 1

I haven't gotten to see it or read the book yet. I plan to read the book. However, I wouldn't have except all these people told me I shouldn't read the book. To me that's an invitation to read it. From what I've heard it's rather Orwellian/Huxleyesque. I know the protagonist fights against a church that totally controls every aspect of people's lives. I also don't see what the big deal is. If a person is afraid reading a book or seeing a movie is going to change their faith, then their faith must not have been very strong.

2007-12-08 15:54:03 · answer #3 · answered by Purdey EP 7 · 3 1

right it truly is my opinion for what this is nicely worth and definite I study the article. on condition that time began human beings have advised thoughts as a fashion of reading and documents the international. maximum thoughts save on with a similar development - heros, villains, conflict and victory, usually. (those are referred to as archetypes.) The thoughts of Christianity and the media they effect (movies, song, notwithstanding) are not any diverse. there have been maximum of action pictures, books, performs and so on that reproduce or symbolize Christian thoughts that it would be impossible to count form. in assessment, agnostic or atheist thoughts are problematical to return by, very few. they are truly purely now being prevalent in bigger markets. this is truly not a conspiracy to any extent further than each and all the Christian inspired artwork that got here previously it. you have a shoppers stunning to no longer view it. you are able to't stay in a international have been each little bit of artwork is in line which contain your person ideals and to cry foul in basic terms with the aid of fact this is not any longer is smug.

2016-11-14 23:35:54 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

My question would be... what does it matter what they do in the movies. If you have on the "Armor of God" and know the difference, how could you possibly be hurt by these futile attempts. Or to put that in terms we all remember from our moms...."If someone jumps off the bridge, does that make it right and would you do it?" The answer is NO and NO..... just because you see something different than what you believe doesn't mean you have to ACT on it.

2007-12-08 16:04:20 · answer #5 · answered by Deborah S 1 · 2 0

Getting all bent over a movie or book is such a wasted effort. There is war, famine, pestilence, human rights violation all over the globe. They would better serve their Lord concentrating on these.

2007-12-08 16:04:22 · answer #6 · answered by gone 7 · 1 0

read all the books, and had someone take me to see the movie today. (i detest nicole kidman and refused to spend any $$ on one of her movies).

loved the books. the movie was, predictably gobbledy-goop, and i did detest nk and her unblinking stares that are supposed to qualify as acting...she stared (or glared) so much in this movie, in lieu of actually acting, that her eyes were bloodshot for most of the movie. (no kidding!)

still a Christian...and still liked the books very much. i never knew mr. pullman was a god-hater, but that doesn't mean he doesn't have literary talent. he spins a great tale!

2007-12-08 16:03:44 · answer #7 · answered by chieko 7 · 3 0

The controversy is because the author is an atheist. I read the book and did not see anything anti-God in it.

2007-12-08 16:12:58 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It lessens my opinion (if possible) of the kind of people who make such a big deal about movies like this.

2007-12-08 15:57:47 · answer #9 · answered by ? 6 · 1 0

i hadn't heard about the books until the movie came out, now i'm determined to read all of the books, just because people say i shouldn't. like i said on one of my pagan yahoo groups, i might even put one on a chain and wear it around my neck.

2007-12-08 15:56:39 · answer #10 · answered by bad tim 7 · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers