I'm talking about it proving that its more powerful than the 360 graphic wise not specs.
2007-12-08 07:08:43 · 7 answers · asked by dlyrical334 2 in Consumer Electronics ➔ Games & Gear ➔ PlayStation
As far as I'm concerned, apart from more game to come, the PS3 has done all it needs to. I think people wont give it the props it deserves cuz they all have 360s and wanna justify their purchases. The PS3 is better than 360 in almost all categories, and soon games will look much better on PS3, but people still like 360s. The price is very competitive next to 360, and very very competitive just as a Blu-ray player. So if people did their research they would see how better PS3 is and buy it, but people dont ever do they research, and usually go by recommendations from their friends further perpetuating their opinions. Also it doesn't help when gamespot, G4, etc are biased and push their pro-360 opinions. So as far as I'm concerned, PS3 is better, I know its better, and I hope more people will realize that its the way to go.
2007-12-08 09:41:56 · answer #1 · answered by NotTheStatusQuo 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Only true PS3 owners would be able to tell you it already has.
PS3's first party exclusives have been consistantly looking better than 360's. Ratchet & Clank Future and Uncharted Drakes Fortune have better graphics than anything you'll see on Xbox. Heavenly Sword, Lair, Resistance, Folklore, Motorstorm are also all fine examples of PS3s awesome grpahics. As for multiplatform games Call of Duty 4 looks better on PS3 along with Ninja Gaiden Sigma, Oblivion, Rainbow 6 Vegas, FEAR, etc.
Only extremely biased fanboys will disagree and argue back and forth. But when you put Uncharted or Ratchet & Clank next to anything on Xbox 360, they blow it out of the water.
Not to mention that games like Ninja Gaiden Sigma, Uncharted, Ratchet and Clank, and Heavenly Sword would all be on 3 discs if they were for 360. Each one of those games has over 25gb of data (graphics,physics, sound effects, voice, musiic, etc.).
Finally. When you compare the first year of both systems existance, the Ps3's first year was so much better it makes the 360's first year look like garbage. 360 first graphically "pretty" game (Gears of War) didn't come until the system was 1.5 years old.
People don't want to admit it, but PS3 has alreadt passed 360 graphically. People that deny it are usually, like I said, biased fanboys.
2007-12-08 16:29:51 · answer #2 · answered by Jeseth 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
2008
2007-12-09 01:38:12 · answer #3 · answered by Bull Goose Loony 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Just wait until the game developers start making more titles. It will be worth the wait. The main problem has been that not enough PS3's have been sold due to it's price. The more that are sold, the more games will be made. With the recent drop in the price and Christmas right around the corner, look for tons of titles to come out in '08 that will blow your mind. GTA should be out by March.
2007-12-08 15:13:08 · answer #4 · answered by Ham B 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
well in theory its already supposed to be better than the 360 cuz of its specs....
but video game programmers are having a hard time adjusting to the blu-ray format.... so answering your question i think it'll start getting better when the programmers master the new format....
but... some games look better on the ps3 than the 360 and vice versa so.... i dont really know...
but are graphics really all that matter to you? cuz for me its the games.....
2007-12-08 16:37:43 · answer #5 · answered by lalala 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
2010
2007-12-08 15:11:05 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
CALL of Duty 4 is better on ps3 than 360.
and i bet you if they made halo 3 for ps3 it would be way better. THE PS3 IS WAY FASTER THAN THE 360...
2007-12-08 15:17:23 · answer #7 · answered by adr412 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋