Lighter materials that provide more insulation and weather resistance have been incorporated into ski clothing.
You can still get jackets and pants that use a basic polyester fill and have heavy-weight shells, but that is old-school tech.
Materials like Primaloft are very light and compact, but trap more dead air than down. More dead air = Warmer.
Materials such as Gore Windstopper and Polartec WindBloc use a windproof laminate that will virtually stop all airflow from the outside of the garment, yet allow your body to breathe and let water vapor pass through, thus keeping you dry. Drier = Warmer.
Softshell materials like Scholler also offer wind resistance without bulk.
Thinsulate, Thermore, and Holofill have been around for years. These aren't as breathable as other materials, but again, they trap a lot of dead air.
Also, a lot of companies produce only a non-insulated shell. They also produce the lining, or mid-layer, piece seperately, allowing the user to customize the jacket.
I have several shells ranging from heavy, bombproof mountaineering jackets to ultralight single layer Gore-Tex. Likewise, I have various mid-layers in wool, Primaloft, Thermore, Polartec, etc. This allows me to vary my wardrobe based on the weather quite easily.
On a day where it is sunny and 37 degrees, I may just wear a Windbloc fleece jacket and keep my lightweight shell stashed in my pack in the event of a sudden rain. On a day where it is 15 degrees, I might wear a Primaloft mid-layer and a heavy duty shell to give myself a bit more protection.
Variety is the spice of life, so go buy a lot of gear!
2007-12-08 07:19:15
·
answer #1
·
answered by Willie D 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think that those coats are fine for keeping you warm...until you fall in the snow and get wet.
For a coat to be both warm AND waterproof, they need an outer shell and a warm fleece or padded inside.
I don't know where you have been shopping, but I still stand by my opinion that Spyder jackets are the absolute best ski jackets for the money. If you are shopping for a good jacket (which your question somewhat implied) I would highly recommend those jackets.
2007-12-08 06:26:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by Catjuggler 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Modern ski jackets in recent years have become thinner by them being made with new materials.
You actually do get the same warmth and waterproofness as the old more padded ones but maybe not the protection.
2007-12-09 05:09:01
·
answer #3
·
answered by gilchrist 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
greater recent jackets have how you are able to do away with the armor. there is often greater valuable armor accessible by ability of different companies in which you will replace regardless of got here inventory on your jacket. It additionally relies upon on your budget. A a hundred dollar shift jacket isnt made with the familiar supplies say a dianese jacket is. yet I do comprehend the place youre coming from. Ive been procuring around for a sparkling jacket and have observed the back protectors in some jackets is only a skinny piece of froth. without genuine help in any respect. i'd wager that its a value reducing diploma and supply a minimum of something greater valuable than no shirt. yet im no professional.
2016-11-14 02:26:44
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
They are called shells. I ski in one. Just wear another layer underneath.
Te advantage is that they are still comfortable for spring skiing, and they are also more useful as a waterproof jacket away from the snow.
2007-12-08 06:52:22
·
answer #5
·
answered by iansand 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
a lot of ski jackets are thin and puffy so you can wear a lot of layers under them
or they could be racing jackets (those are really skinny so you can race in them, they are aerodynamic and thin so you can go much faster
good luck
2007-12-09 06:11:23
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
i bought one in America last year and it is full of padding and very warm........... i never get cold
2007-12-08 06:23:47
·
answer #7
·
answered by Richard P 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
milder/hardly any snow
2007-12-08 06:23:18
·
answer #8
·
answered by Clint 6
·
0⤊
1⤋