English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Will this be enough to keep President Bush from authorizing military action against the country?

2007-12-08 05:46:54 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Military

8 answers

If you had read the report you will note that based on information received a few months ago, they _think_ that Iran placed its nuclear program on hold in 2003.

Which coincides with the time that they gained possession of a set of blueprints for a tested nuclear warhead. (In other words they now had all of the technical information they needed - they just needed the plutonium and enriched uranium).

As a result it makes sense for them to place their nuclear program on hold until they get enough plutonium and enriched uranium.

One thing you should remember is that none of us saw the entire document. We only saw the parts that somebody wanted us to see. As is typical with intelligence 'leaks' the information leaked is generally misleading and designed to push a political agenda.

2007-12-08 08:09:14 · answer #1 · answered by MikeGolf 7 · 2 0

Nuclear weapons shouldn't in any respect be used against any united states of america with the aid of fact it could spark a chain of activities which could end our species. the undertaking with Iran would be solved with out pressing the great pink button and risking our survival. the U. S. are already making their bunker buster bombs synods effective with a view to injury Iran's nuclear centers in the event that they arrive to a decision to accomplish that. i'm in little doubt that the international won't in any respect and could under no circumstances enable Iran to have nuclear weapons and spark a nuclear palms race in a volatile area, this could be prevented in any respect costs yet no longer with using a nuclear weapon. Iranians do no longer need to die with the aid of gov't idiotic race for nuclear palms. Israel will provide up Iran on cooperation with the U. S. and others. Iran, in my opinion, threatens the protection of the completed planet and might't be relied on with a nuclear weapon which they might little doubt sell to terrorist companies and would gladly sit down returned on a similar time as a nuclear device is detonated in Tel Aviv or the U. S..

2016-11-14 21:58:12 · answer #2 · answered by wendland 4 · 0 0

Frankly we are in no position to get entangled in another armed conflict. We have military actions in Iraq and Afghanistan that frankly require to much money, time, and man power to get involved with an armed conflict with Iran. Additionally, some nations view are Intel as not creditable and we may have trouble building international support for the time being. Since Iran does not have nuclear capabilities at the moment, we will stay out militarily. If Iran started to posses nuclear technology we would probably have to reassess the situation, and probably would resort to a coalition of forces led by America to prevent this. Weather it be by strategic missile attacks or full scale war. Also, by no means am I saying if Iran provoked us or our Allies, that we would sit tight.

2007-12-08 05:59:09 · answer #3 · answered by Jordan L 1 · 1 2

Absolutly not. He is so mental that he will go bomb first and ask questions later. He is already sending out the counter propaganda so make that report sound ineffective.

But Iran does not want war. Do you know that many other of our former alies are lineing up with Iran to take US down if we take that step??? America is now the "Hitler" of the 21st century in the eyes of Europe, Asia and South America and Africa. And they will take us down through our money. They already have all the ducks in a row.

2007-12-08 05:58:53 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

I assure you that U.S. interventions at anywhere is not what it's representants says it is.

For example, do you really think that the war in Iraq is just a "war on terror"?, of course not, they (the representants) are just trying to manipulate the oil prices.

Now concerning Iran, it probably has some strategical interests to Bush, so to influence Iran's politics, they acuse it of something, such as "Illegal nuke warfare creation" and etc.


Do not believe just at what the TV shows you, take your own thoughts.

2007-12-08 05:55:31 · answer #5 · answered by ? 3 · 2 2

An actual question? where is our Robert R and what have you done to him? Someone should check the basement for a body pod.

2007-12-08 09:20:16 · answer #6 · answered by Idonplay 5 · 0 0

You better hope it will be. But sadly, it probably won't. Apparently Bush doesn't let little things like 'information' stop him from doing what he wants.

2007-12-08 06:05:11 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

I think whats happening is the CIA has decided to break away from the "Bush/Chaney/Lieberman agenda.

2007-12-08 05:54:21 · answer #8 · answered by Dave M 7 · 3 2

fedest.com, questions and answers