why do you object to the term Flintstonism, as in your theory is Flintstonism, you are a Flintstonian ...?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Flintstones
2007-12-08 03:48:10 · 11 answers · asked by Brendan G 4 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
HAHAHAHA!!!! Love it.
Especially due to the fact that the "Creation Museum" shows people and dinosaurs interacting and they actually have SADDLE-like things on some of the dinos as if people rode them like horses.
How stoopid can anyone get?
It's so hard to realize that there are people living among us who are so incredibly dumb and uneducated......WOW!
2007-12-08 04:18:41 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
All you have to do is prove it. Prove how it started with a single cell. That the correct atoms got together in the correct way with the correct number in the correct conditions and started replicating itself and then started evolving into other kinds. Evolutionists point to how bacteria and viruses evolve so quickly, so why not with the first living cells? Here's the other catch though. As soon as this is done through experiment, intelligence is involved. But as evolutionists are very adamant about, intelligence is in no way involved. Therefore, it can't even be tested. So it has to be found in nature. Well if evolution were true, then it should still be occurring. So where are all these atoms getting together and creating life? Or did it just stop? If it stopped, why? If it was a one time chance that the first living cell occurred, then one who believes that has more faith than any creationist. Especially when all the factors are taken into consideration of how life is even possible in the universe.
2016-05-22 04:16:31 · answer #2 · answered by cherly 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Stupid person, Dinosaurs died out 64 million years ago. First humans come onto the scene about 8 million.
Sorry charlie. No flintstones.
Try reading a book other than the lies you are reading.
2007-12-08 03:53:11 · answer #3 · answered by HE'S WATCHING YOU 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Flintstonism is great dear.
What about a clever name for those promoting "intelligent falling" to replace the laws of Newton ?
2007-12-08 03:52:23 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
Humans and dinosaurs did not co-exist.
Humans lived in the Middle East, but no dino bones have ever been found there inside the mountain boundaries.
(The boundaries are the Zagros, Elburz, Caucasus, and Atlas Mountains, and the Mediterranean, Red and Arabian Seas.)
Which brings up an interesting question:
Dinos apparently had millions and millions of years to migrate into the Middle East. Why didn't they?
2007-12-08 03:51:43 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
You need to contact Dr. Carl Baugh in Glenstone, TX and ask him what evidence he has about the co-existence of man and dinosaur.
2007-12-08 03:53:52 · answer #6 · answered by realchurchhistorian 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Great idea! First time I hear about it. I have no objection.
2007-12-08 03:51:58 · answer #7 · answered by kwistenbiebel 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I like that dinosaur crane.
2007-12-08 03:52:43 · answer #8 · answered by Aspurtaime Dog Sneeze 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If dinosaurs and man did not co-exist, what do we make of many ancient pictures of dinosaurs? Were the dinosaurs that artistic?
2007-12-08 03:58:22 · answer #9 · answered by Poor Richard 5 · 0⤊ 5⤋
I don't think that they co-existed, and I don't know anyone else who does. I do think that Man was the last of creation, and I think your fossil records shows that to be the case as well.
2007-12-08 03:54:31 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋