When Jesus was stabbed in the side while on the cross....?

Question

Wasnt there a passage saying he initially didnt bleed??? Anyone can give me a quote? thanks!!!

ok i guess im wrong.. is there ANY PASSAGE where he doesnt bleed after being injured?

Answer 1

John 19:34 "Instead, one of the soldiers pierced Jesus' side with a spear, bringing a sudden flow of blood and water."
- NIV


any passage where he didn't bleed? I dont think so, he didn't get physically injured all that often.

The apostle Paul on the other hand - maybe?

Answer 2

This incident in the Crucifixion story is found only in the Gospel of John, chapter 19 verses 31 - 37, and not in any of the other 3 Gospels. Below is the NIV taken from biblegateway.com. I don't see any reference to Him not bleeding at first.

31Now it was the day of Preparation, and the next day was to be a special Sabbath. Because the Jews did not want the bodies left on the crosses during the Sabbath, they asked Pilate to have the legs broken and the bodies taken down. 32The soldiers therefore came and broke the legs of the first man who had been crucified with Jesus, and then those of the other. 33But when they came to Jesus and found that he was already dead, they did not break his legs. 34Instead, one of the soldiers pierced Jesus' side with a spear, bringing a sudden flow of blood and water. 35The man who saw it has given testimony, and his testimony is true. He knows that he tells the truth, and he testifies so that you also may believe. 36These things happened so that the scripture would be fulfilled: "Not one of his bones will be broken,"[b] 37and, as another scripture says, "They will look on the one they have pierced."[c]

Answer 3

Here you go. This is the New International version and to me it looks like he bled right away.

John 19:31-37

31Now it was the day of Preparation, and the next day was to be a special Sabbath. Because the Jews did not want the bodies left on the crosses during the Sabbath, they asked Pilate to have the legs broken and the bodies taken down. 32The soldiers therefore came and broke the legs of the first man who had been crucified with Jesus, and then those of the other. 33But when they came to Jesus and found that he was already dead, they did not break his legs. 34Instead, one of the soldiers pierced Jesus' side with a spear, bringing a sudden flow of blood and water. 35The man who saw it has given testimony, and his testimony is true. He knows that he tells the truth, and he testifies so that you also may believe. 36These things happened so that the scripture would be fulfilled: "Not one of his bones will be broken,"[b] 37and, as another scripture says, "They will look on the one they have pierced."[c]

Answer 4

Some say that a broken heart was a factor in the death of Jesus Christ, of whom it was prophesied: “Reproach itself has broken my heart, and the wound is incurable.” (Psalm 69:20) Are these words to be understood literally? Perhaps so, for the hours preceding Jesus’ death were agonizing—not only physically but also emotionally. (Matthew 27:46; Luke 22:44; Hebrews 5:7) Furthermore, a broken heart may explain why “blood and water” flowed from a spear wound inflicted on Jesus just after his death. A rupture of the heart or a major blood vessel could discharge blood either into the chest cavity or into the pericardium—a fluid-containing membrane that loosely encases the heart. In either location a puncture could cause the flow of what would appear to be “blood and water.”—John 19:34.

Answer 5

My know-how is that the practice of killing a crucifixion sufferer with a spear replaced into not uncommon. Crucifixion isn't a delightful thank you to die. If the sufferer had the money (or the sufferer's relatives) then they could pay off the guard to deliver a speedy end to the sufferer's suffering. Which does advance an attractive question. in case you are going to be able to desire to pay off a guard to try this, how plenty greater could you are going to be able to desire to pay for the guard to spear a hid bladder of cow blood, declare the sufferer ineffective and launch the 'corpse' to the relatives? The taking down of Jesus' physique is fairly unusual too. generally the corpse replaced into left superb, to rot and be eaten by potential of scavengers. This replaced into to function an occasion and likewise, in a society the place desirable burial replaced into seen considered necessary, to extra degrade the sufferer, even interior the afterlife. That Jesus is decrease down and surpassed over to his followers is fairly very unusual. To my know-how with all the 1000's of recorded crucifixions there has in basic terms been the only discovery of remains of somebody crucified. needless to say this suggests that this part of the tale is accessible, although that is fairly unusual. yet then the finished concept-approximately Jesus being crucified by potential of the Romans for the 'crime' of heresy against the Jewish scriptures is ridiculous. If this replaced into genuine does not the Romans stood lower back and enable the Jewish leaders take Jesus out and stone him to demise, consistent with Jewish regulation? If Jesus replaced into so regular that the Jewish leaders have been unwilling to try this then why could the Romans even evaluate it? Crucifixion in basic terms is smart if Jesus replaced right into a political chief making hardship for Rome in a Roman province. wherein case the Roman government could have come down on him like a ton of bricks.

Answer 6

Yes, The Romans stuck a spear into his side, and out poured blood and water. the Gospel of John chapter 19, verse 33-37.
The early Church believed that Jesus death was for told in the Hebrew Scriptures, that his bones would not be broken; Psalm 34:20 and that he would be pierces;Zechariah 12:10. (It was apparently a Roman custom to break the legs of the crucified to speed their death, they would suffocate faster if they could not push down on their legs to get a breath, and cutting into their side, Jesus died before this was done).
The Church has many ideas about the sacred mysteries and imagery found in this scene. It is to some of us the holy of holies, (when he died the seamless veil in the Temple ripped apart and we can now enter freely).
In some ways Christianity is a very bloody religion, in spite of what we do to dress it up and make it pretty.
But it also has some very profound and powerful things to say about the nature of the universe and your and my place in it.
Read the account yourself, it does not take long.

Answer 7

John 19:34 New American Standard
but one of the soldiers pierced His side with a spear,
and immediately there came out blood and water.

The water having separated from the blood - showed that Jesus was truly dead.

Answer 8

No, on the contrary the passages refer to blood and water.

John 19:34 But one of the soldiers with a spear pierced his side, and forthwith came there out blood and water.

Answer 9

NO.

It was the Roman custom to deal a death blow to those on the "STAUROS" [ upright pole or stake]
Jesus did not die on a cross.
They also broke the victims legs. in the case of Jesus, they did not, thus fulfillin a prophecy from the Old Testament.
(PSALM 34:20) He is guarding all the bones of that one; Not one of them has been broken.

This is Jehovah God, Jesus' Father in heaven, protecting Jesus' bones.
Jesus' death, though is part of the price that Jesus paid to free us from having to die.
(REVELATION 21:4) And he will wipe out every tear from their eyes, and death will be no more, neither will mourning nor outcry nor pain be anymore. The former things have passed away.”

Answer 10

There's is no passage in the Bible that says that, because we are forgiven by Jesus shedding His blood.

There is a passage that says His bones would not be broken.

Psalm 34
20 he protects all his bones,
not one of them will be broken.