English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-12-07 20:00:39 · 8 answers · asked by maninthecornner 3 in Travel Australia Other - Australia

8 answers

I think its made some sort of difference But I think its the same old story, penalise the innocent for the ciminal actions of a few

2007-12-07 20:06:15 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

There are gun restrictions in Australia but not a gun ban. The big difference is that people in Australia do not have a gun attitude and no-one owns or carries guns for personal or home defence. I was reading that a few years ago in one year the number of gun deaths in the USA was 38,000 while in the same year, the deaths in Japan, Australia, the UK and France (together about the same population as the USA) was under 1000. There are gun restrictions in those four countries.

The presence or absence of guns makes no difference to the crime rates apart from gun-related crimes. Criminals, for the most part, are not armed in Australia. Every shooting leads the news in Australia, in the USA it has to be a big one to even make the news.

2007-12-08 09:55:56 · answer #2 · answered by tentofield 7 · 0 0

If you are a person of good character and have a reasonable reason, you may own lever or bolt action rifles, revolvers and automatic pistols. You may also own a shotgun, though I am not sure that pump-action shotties are permitted. The ban and recall several years ago was on semi-automatic rifles as they keep on firing while you keep on pulling the trigger. Some could be converted to full machine guns by a very simple modification. Those were the firearms that were recalled.

This ban followed a series of massacres, two in Melbourne and one at Port Arthur in Tasmania, all of them involving criminally insane persons. There has been no massacre of that kind in Australia since.

As for other firearm - related isolated murders and stick-ups, these tend to be with pistols that have either been recently stolen or have been in the criminal underground for many years. There are probably still a lot of unlicensed revolvers around as they were fairly common in the 1920s and earlier.

In any case the murder rate in Australia is about 300 per year, not all of these with firearms. It is small by comparison with that of the USA.

2007-12-07 22:47:20 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

you are mistaken in thinking that there is a gun ban ... we CAN own guns.. but must have a valid reason for doing so and we must abide by laws concerning guns...

My two neighbours BOTH have guns .. and if I applied for a shooter's license and passed a test ..I too could own a gun .

there are restrictions on the TYPE of guns we can own...

but as for the crime rate... I think you will find that generally Australia has ALWAYS had a relatively low gun-related crime rate... ( even though sadly we do have the world's highest number of people killed in a single shooting incident in our history) ......

A few years back ... we had almost fortnightly murders taking place in Melbourne ... with guns being the weapon of choice
..however it was a part of an underworld war .. and involved no innocent people being killed ( although the actions were becoming increasingly risky and broke criminal moral codes when two men were shot in front of one of theirs very young children) ...... so while that BUMPED up the actual crime rate .. the general public were not in DIRECT danger...

THIS year in melbourne .. a man was shot dead in Melbourne ... when he went to the assistance of a woman who was being abducted ... The abductor pulled a gun and shot two would be rescuers
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2007_Melbourne_CBD_shootings
one died , and the other a tourist recovered. BUT this shooting made national and international news .. partly because such crimes are so very rare ...IF anything more gun related wounds/deaths are accidental ....

Knives tend to be more of an issue at the moment.

We don't have people hiding under their beds ( as Charlton Heston once told a gathering of NRA members) .. and we do NOT walk the streets in fear of being mugged/raped/ or murdered because we DON'T carry guns...
I feel safe when I venture into Melbourne and when I am home alone...

we do not have the vicious cycle of :
I CARRY A GUN .. BECAUSE THEY MAY CARRY A GUN..BECAUSE I MAY CARRY A GUN.. BECAUSE THEY MAY CARRY A GUN ....

I can walk the streets and live in my home and be fairly safe in believing that anybody who may try and harm me .. will NOT be carrying a gun.....

also ...
I know that there will be less accidental shootings because a toddler find dad's loaded hand gun in the bedside drawers..
AND I KNOW that the laws we have have prevented the American style high school shootings.

Back in 1987, an american friend of ours returned from the states and told us in horror of how he was driving along some road in Fresno .. when a man pointed a gun at them from another car ..... and how he was afraid of how the states had become..... and that he hoped that kind of thing would never happen here.... the date he said that was 7th of August .
I can remember it because on the 9th of August this happened : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julian_Knight .

I am glad we have the laws we have , because I feel safer .

2007-12-07 20:56:45 · answer #4 · answered by ll_jenny_ll here AND I'M BAC 7 · 9 0

Is there a gun ban in Australia? That's news to me.

By the way - how's the violent crime rate over there in the USA?

2007-12-07 22:00:04 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yup, before everything kinfolk heirlooms truly spring to techniques, my grandfathers shotgun isn't nicely worth plenty to absolutely everyone yet me. next, the historic firearms that have great magnitude. Matt Dillon's long barreled Colt which could of killed 1000 undesirable adult males on the exhibit screen. John Wayne's weapons . and so on! You get my pick the flow. Thirdly, in case you seem problematical sufficient you ought to purchase pretty much any illicit drug in pretty much city in united statesa., how can banning weapons exchange the provision? it fairly is a stupid thought that taking the weapons faraway from regulation abiding electorate would help the ever reducing crime in united statesa.. Fourth, how with regard to the guy or corporation that has great investments in old, forte, uncommon firearms, how are they to be reimbursed if in any respect. 5th, what if the human beings do unlike this concept however the government nonetheless pushes by a banishment variety regulation that may no longer subsidized by fifty one% of the electorate? What if it starts yet another Civil conflict? Our final Civil conflict started over Sectionalization of the south (no longer slavery as maximum folk think of) the south felt it became being over powered and short replaced in congress by the northern and western politicos no longer giving the south this is uncomplicated proportion of counsel with this is transportation needs and different such themes. certainly truly some the rail roads (RR) of the time have been located on an east/west song and few into the south. possibly finally, it variety of feels to me that it truly is an industry that provides you with 1000's of jobs interior the U.S. and someplace else, how do you intend on re-utilising those 1000's of idled workers that would finally hotel to violence and crime?

2016-11-14 21:00:38 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Much better than america where every one including children own guns.

2007-12-08 13:48:48 · answer #7 · answered by waltzsingmatilda 3 · 0 0

for a small minority a gun around can be bad news. That guy who killed himself and others in USA a good case.

2007-12-07 20:43:28 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers