Exactly...were where these teachers when I was in H.S....I wouldn't have told!
2007-12-07 17:26:40
·
answer #1
·
answered by talismb 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
You can contact the police officer's supervisors or internal affairs department, but you cannot sue them over this, especially if you got the dogs back. Police are a protected class when it comes to lawsuits. They can only be sued when there is gross negligence, and this is by far not the case here. As others have already pointed out, the police are not babysitters. Their first job is to secure the location and make sure everything is safe, not to go after a dog that got out of the house. Your dogs should have been better trained to not leave the house when the door is open. 1. No, the police shouldn't have let the dogs out, but the dogs are the ones that were not properly trained, and the dogs are the last thing on the officers' minds. You have to remember the police have no clue what they are getting into. They don't know if it's a robbery, kidnapping, just an intruder inside, etc. 2. Again, the police are not babysitters. 3. They can enter if there is probable cause, no "permit" is required. Look it up before claiming something you don't know about. ETA: As already stated, if you feel they were wrong, you can contact their supervisors, or internal affairs department and report them. They will be dealt with accordingly. What does the door not being open have to do with anything? If you don't want the police to do their jobs when your alarm goes off, maybe you should have your alarm disabled. If police have probable cause to believe something is not right, they have every right to enter the residence to make sure everything is OK. An alarm going off and a call from the alarm company is more than enough probable cause for them to enter without any sort of warrant. ALL the things you mention are things you can report to the internal affairs unit of the police department or the police officers' superiors. You have no lawsuit against them. No matter how you spin it, you have no lawsuit.
2016-05-22 03:09:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Since this is law enforcement, the law does not consider "casting a spell" to be anything.
In this case, there was a crime committed, and that crime was statutory rape, which means that an adult had sex with a minor who was not old enough to legally consent. It doesn't matter if the minor started the relationship or if he wanted it or not. According to the law, he was too young to decide for himself, and the adult woman should have been able to not have a relationship with him.
The teacher did do something wrong, she had sex with a minor. If it has been 30 years, the statute of limitations may have already passed, and if she doesn't have newer victims then legally she is in the clear. This, however, depends on the local laws.
2007-12-07 18:29:51
·
answer #3
·
answered by jellybeanchick 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
You should never be involved with your teacher because
1) you're ages are very diffrent so you have diffrent interests and stuff
2) it's illegal unless you're over 18
3) you'll both be in trouble if someone finds out
4) it's very unlikely that the relationship will work
2007-12-07 17:35:19
·
answer #4
·
answered by anastasiastarz 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
The teacher is an adult and her position is one of authority. We've often had the discussion in my family through the years, and my question has always been:" Where were these teachers when I was in school?"
2007-12-07 17:24:56
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
what do you mean,you don't know how they pulled it off?
2007-12-07 17:29:16
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'd say neither really.
But that's just me. :)
2007-12-07 17:26:48
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋