English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

31 answers

Ask an atheist what happened during the time before the actual "bang" called planck time. No, they don't teach that in the west. The Big Bang is a western theory all together. They're so ignorant about it that a large group of people at the Darwin exhibit actually laughed at me when I turned to my friend and said the Big Bang was a western theory. Apparently, the west doesn't know that everyone else in the world, including most Europeans, do not subscribe to Big Bang. I do not, either. The universe started with a high speed particle stream that occurred before the actual bang. And then there was light----------------------------->

BTW, God would never create God. It's a moot point and a stupid circular question. Not everything has a creation point. Creation as we know it is something a human being needs to understand. Try explaining DNA to a three year old and see the reaction you get. I would explain it as clays and how they mesh together. What atheists refuse to understand is that learning is in stages and that everything is relative, including time.

2007-12-07 16:51:38 · answer #1 · answered by Legend 4 · 0 3

no longer which you will care or comprehend the version, however the huge Bang (technically, an instantaneous after the huge Bang) is what we've empirically defined because of the fact the initiating of our common universe because of the fact it provides a organic boundary on the present quantity and bounds of medical study. a million. the form is extremely genuine as we nevertheless can hit upon the easy and sound created by ability of the explosion (it isn't any longer a hypothetical experience because of the fact it left actual evidence). 2. all of us comprehend that the physics of our universe carry actual back to that element. 3. we can't communicate authoritatively of the phyiscs that defined issues till now the huge Bang because of the fact the easy produced by ability of the explosion (massive Bang) is so severe that that's obstructing our view and, consequently, our skill to work out what replaced into happening in the previous in time. 4. in spite of everything, no person has ever claimed that the huge Bang got here from no longer something. only because of the fact we gained't see backstage on the 2d would not recommend that there is a yellow brick toad in the back of it which will bring about a real Wizard of oz..

2016-11-14 01:19:55 · answer #2 · answered by deviny 4 · 0 0

Legend, I like how you project your own ignorance onto others.

For starters: Darwin has nothing to do with the Big Bang (evolution only deals with the development and diversification of life). If you brought up the subject at a Darwin exhibit, no wonder people laughed at you.
Darwin similarly has nothing to do with atheism (evolution is true whether or not there is a God).
The Big Bang is far from a "Western" theory, whatever that means - it is the accepted scientific description of what happened at the very start of our universe.
It is not true that most Europeans don't subscribe to the Big Bang.
The Big Bang theory itself doesn't describe where the singularity came from - this is covered by other theories like Brane and String theories, which are very tentative at this point.

And, to answer the question, I agree with the others who asked how God could have happened unless...

2007-12-07 20:30:09 · answer #3 · answered by Daniel R 6 · 4 0

No one knows what the universe was like before the instant of the Big Bang. The claim that it didn't exist at all until that point is an assumption which is backed up by exactly zero evidence.

The fact that you don't know the answer to a question doesn't give you the right to make one up and claim that you do.

2007-12-07 16:39:29 · answer #4 · answered by scifiguy 6 · 7 1

if antimatter can be made essentially from nothing, then the big bang is theoretically possible. a single gram of antimatter contains as much energy as a 40 kiloton nuclear bomb, a high speed collision between particles could have started something, but no one knows for sure. There is no proof against or for the big bang theory just as there is no proof for or against God, no one will ever know.

2007-12-07 17:30:02 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

How could it have happened? That's what scientists are trying to work out. In the meantime, atheists don't feel the need to jump to the conclusion that it must have been God. Okay?

2007-12-08 07:12:02 · answer #6 · answered by LifeIsAFreeTripRoundTheSun 6 · 0 0

shouldn't you be asking this to physicist's?

I'm more than happy to admit that I don't have all the answers to life the universe and everything

Not having those answers is not a valid reason for shoving a god in there when you can't prove that a god exists in the first place though.

2007-12-07 23:56:24 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Oh dear is this what goes for logic in fundy 'brains'? Look at your replies you clown! Do you not realise what a fool you look? You are the very antithesis of intelligent design! (look it up dude!) Maybe you could enlighten us with your mathematical insights into the nature of string theory, C/Y space and the quantum vacuum? Is it on a par with your knowledge of the imagined mind of god?? Fool!

2007-12-07 17:59:17 · answer #8 · answered by alienfiend1 3 · 4 1

the christian fairy tale god was not invented when the big bang happened billions of years ago it just like the christians trying to control things thats why people hate them

2007-12-08 02:02:41 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

How can god have happened unless some god creator created the god that is assumed to have created the big bang?

Oh dear dear......

2007-12-07 16:34:54 · answer #10 · answered by CC 7 · 6 3

fedest.com, questions and answers