If a site has something bad to say about Khomeini should i believe it? When this same sites abuses our prophet

Question

Kimo and obadulla: this little site are a joke mr X and your like, your knowledge is nothing compared to a Muslim a true Muslim, you can easily be refuted simply because truth will prevail. These are all lies and fabrication, by the time you finish reading this you will spit at the man that is using these anti Islamic sites not shia by the way they are ANTI-ISLAMIC!!! site . CAN'T YOU SEE THEY ARE ABUSING YOUR PROPHET (s) Now lets start:

"A man can have sex with animals such as sheep's, cows, camels and so on. However....."

I don't know if I should laugh or cry. Laugh at these jokes or cry for ignorants that will believe this!!
Although I know that real Muslims will never believe these shameful lies and slander but to show the people who doubt I will write. They haven't even shown Farsi documents and that means they themselves know that they are lying. And whoever is pasting and supporting a site that claim our prophet is a pedophile starfruit.

As you all know in Islamic laws we have punishments. For example if someone drinks alcohol or kill another person or any work against Islamic laws he/she should and will be punished and Islam never punishes anyone for "Halal" things, all punishments are for doing "Harams". So, if in Islamic laws we see punishment for an action or sinful deed it shows that action is surely "Haram".

Now lets look at this part of Ayatollah Khomeini's book you will see the punishment of having sex with animals:
"Tahrir alwasile": the book of "Hudud"(legal punishments),saying if you have sex with animals and the dead. Numbers: 1,2,3

http://www.wilayah.org/arabi/ahkam/tahrir/index.htm

Now for people who don't know Arabic I will translate them briefly:

1- Having sex with animals has punishments and it depends upon the dictum of leader and...

3- If someone repeat this work if he hasn't punished yet he should be punished but if he had been punished before for this work and he again repeat it, he should be killed for the fourth time.-though as a precaution-(If he repeated it three times and after each time he had been punished for the fourth time he should be killed)
Now I ask you how can this work be allowed in Islam how can they say khomani allows this?!!!!!!! Allah-o-Akbar

And they continued:

"However he should kill the animal after he has his orgasm. He should not sell the meat to the people......."
As I searched in the "Tahriri Al wasile" ; it is written in "Tahrir al wasile":
The book of eatables and drinkable: saying about animals, number 22,23

22-One of things which cause that an animal being Haram ,Although it was Hala, is that a human have sex with it and...... and because of this work(sodomizing with animal) it's meat and the meat of it's lamb which will be born after sodomizing will all be Haram and it's milk and wool and hair too.

23- If the animal which someone had sex with it is one of the eatable animals like sheep and cow and camel it should be killed (Zebh) and burned....... And if it is on of the animals which is not eatable usually and are used for riding and transportation, like horse and donkey ,it should be taken out of the city and be solved in the other city.

Where do you see this:" however selling the meat to the next door village should be fine." ? Animal's meat is Haram how can you sell it to the next door village?!!!

Ayatollah Khomeini has written in his book that you can sell the animals which are used for riding and transportation in the other cities,but they have written: selling the meat of the animal in next door villages is fine!!!!!

Where do you see that Ayatollah Khomeini wrote these fabricated slander?!!

Like i told you in the previous parts that they have written a book they haven't translated it!!!

The fourth part of their sayings:

"If one commits the act of sodomy with a cow, a ewe ,or a camel ,their urine and their excrement's become impure and....."

If you look at number 22 which I have translated briefly previously you will see that they have changed the main text. And there you can see the antics of the hypocrites.

As you saw in the third part they has written :"You can sell the meat of this animal in the next door village" but here they say(as it is in the Tahrir al wasile):"You should burn the animal as quickly as possible."
Here you can see the contradiction between their translations and the truth. It is the strongest evidence which refutes their charges, they have changed the main text for their benefits.

My brothers and sisters I hope you open your eyes, and see these hypocrites for what they really are.


W salaam.


And Allah will, certainly, make manifest those who believe and He will, surely, distinguish the hypocrites from the believers.

Holy Quran

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AigFaJvMb83.4FHMEKMQpJzn7BR.;_yl...

Brother Muhammad answer that was reported for answering this question.

Answer 1

No, you shouldn't believe it straight away. But do check in Khomeini's book.

I got the book in Arabic, and all I can say it's pretty indefensible. If you guy want to lead constructive dialog with Sunnis you should stay away from Khomeini, because Sunnis hate him, and he isn't one of the pillars of the Shia faith. Just some small advice from me. And secondly, don't use copy paste texts from shiachat.com, especially if it contains links that are not working, which was the case with the text that defended Khomeini and it ended up saying that there is no need to defend Khomeini because he was so holy (????!!!).

If you really want unity with Sunnis keep away from Khomeini. He spoke about unity, but in practice he put Sunnis in Iran in a very unfavorable position. He preached one and practiced another.

Is this the unity you are calling us to?
http://youtube.com/watch?v=LUs3K751a5k&feature=related
http://youtube.com/watch?v=r9LrFbCjvJI&feature=related

I am Iraqi and I am truly hurt by these songs.

Answer 2

I do not know how old you are, if you were old enough to live during the time Khomeini ruled in Iran you would know how bad he really is. My Aunts family is from Iran and they managed to get out of Iran around the early 80's. They lost many family members because of Khomeini.
He has said these things not just in this book but in other places such as lectures.
What makes me laugh is the same people here supporting him are the same ones who are saying that we should be friends with Jews etc when he wanted to kill them all. Also, these same people are living in western countries and Khomeini would have had them killed for doing such. He was a sick man who used his power to hurt many people not just his enemies but his own.
He is not a Prophet nor is he anyone that any of us are obliged to defend. So, he is not comparable with Prophet Mohammed(saw), your question is really invalid.

Answer 3

As muslim, we should remember one lesson in sociology that The Holy Prophet have tought us. Never believe a rumour without just evidence. Never propagate a slander or bad preconception for that would certainly create a crack in the unity of the brotherhood.
if a fellow muslim is hurt, we are liable to defend him. if not his body, then his honour. I think we should more then just thought of defending the dignity of the Holy Prophet(pbuh) himself. But do it the most intellectual way, not bashing around. They abuse, we defend. But gently. "Confront Evil with Righteousness" is teaching of the Quran.

Answer 4

remeber there is not only one site in the world researching this topic. try goin to another site and see if they have the same info. just look on a couple of different sites. but for the record is they abuse the prophet, that means they don't care about islam or it's people.

Answer 5

Interesting that you wrote khomeini (sick and pervert) with uppercase but you used the lowercase with the name of our Prophet (SAWS).

This is a typical shia mentality.
You better answer the shia questions instead of causing stir here.

Answer 6

according to hypocrites yes you should believe it, according to islam NO you should not.

"And do not follow (blindly) any information of which you have no (direct) knowledge. (Using your faculties of perception and conception, you must verify it for yourself. (In the Court of your Guardian-Lord,) you will be held accountable for your hearing, sight, and the faculty of reasoning."[17:36]

edit: I got thumbs down for quoting from the Quran... nice. I wasn't defending ''Knomeini'', I don't even know who he is. I was just answering the question (that- No we shouldn't accept a website that says bad things about Prophet Muhammad)

Answer 7

before reading anything, i always look at the credibility of the book/author/website. You know more than half of what you read is false and twisted.

Answer 8

What about his OWN books?