And with no fire support.
2007-12-07 08:57:43 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
IF THE SPARTANS COULD DO IT, THEN THE SAS THEY COULD DO IT TOO!
2007-12-07 09:03:12 · update #1
relax sweetheart...SAS are hard *** motherfuckers, but guess what?...every (major) country has a very elite, very well trained special operations group. Alot of them train together from time to time. British SAS are among the original Special Operators, sure, but nowadays, they arent alone...they are in league with the likes of Australia's SAS, the US's Delta and DevGru, Israel has some solid special operations units too.
Let me guess, you were playing Call of Duty 4 and watching 300 at the same time...werent you....
you were...
2007-12-07 12:35:25 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
hand handy attempt against? that would not make experience. yeah the SEALs are in great shape in all yet they could not kill a million men with their bare palms! as nicely, why might they be punching men? now even without fancy air help and all that, if there have been 3 hundred seals who had their huge-unfold kit vs a million random terrorists and insurgents who had AKs and RPGs and each thing, the seals could desire to truly carry them off because of the fact they are so tactically sound and so nicely knowledgeable. regardless of in the event that they have been thoroughly surrounded and encircled, with good disguise they might win. elite forces like the SAS, SEALs, military Rangers might have not got any project with a team of punk Iraqis certainly those particular forces communities are ultimate utilized in recon and particular ops (duh). combating a million infantrymen could be extra alongside the lines of purely a huge-unfold (yet huge) infantry unit. nevertheless, provided that the SEALs, Rangers are the final of the final, that they had placed up an exceptionally sturdy combat on the very worst.
2016-12-10 15:50:12 · answer #2 · answered by melgoza 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I know from experience the SAS are good but not that good. Those are impossible odds. As for the Spartans, they held back the enemy because thr enemy had to cross a narrow bridge to get past them, and they weren't taking on a million
2007-12-07 12:22:34 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Stop day dreaming and start focusing on reality, yes the SAS are the best of the best, but even they have limitations.
2007-12-07 09:09:54 · answer #4 · answered by ~Celtic~Saltire~ 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
very very unlikely, I mean for a start it would be impossible to carry a million rounds of ammo, secondly the standard infantry formula dictates at least a 3 to 1 numerical advantage for the attacking force
2007-12-07 09:37:08 · answer #5 · answered by vdv_desantnik 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
probably.the spartans never ''did'' it,they got slaughtered in the end.the ''300'' only managed to hold and delay 5000 persians,for a while under the leadership of leo ! (leonidas)
2007-12-07 09:07:51 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Wouldn't need 300. 30 would be ample.
Edit: Four thumbs down (at time of edit). Must be a few yanks on here tonight thinking about their navy seals. Ok, I'll revise my original answer - it would only take 25 SAS.
2007-12-07 09:02:11 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
well there was only arrows, spears, swords,and shields Then. Now we've Guns,Missles,grenades. I would say if you took out the missles part. They would have a chance. But most likely that would get there asses handed to them.
2007-12-07 09:36:02 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
the SBS could do it with 4 men
2007-12-07 11:16:51 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Another Moronic Question with no connection to the real Military world.
2007-12-07 09:04:44 · answer #10 · answered by conranger1 7 · 2⤊ 4⤋