The only alternative to slavery was death. God and Jesus taught life. Your ancestors knew this and that is how they could love Him in the worst of times.
2007-12-07 08:22:30
·
answer #1
·
answered by Fish <>< 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
As mrmyers said slavery then was not the slavery most Americans think of first God did not condone the kidnapping and selling of man for slavery "He who kidnaps a man, whether he sells him or he is found in his possession, shall surely be put to death." (Exodus 21:16) if he did I don't think he would have punished the Egyptians. Basically in that time most of the people from the middle east were very poor so what families would do is sell their kids or selfs to rich land owners to do labor for food and shelter and there were also as we call them Indentured servants who would work for 7 years if they were in debt to a landowner and killing slaves meant you were to die, in the new Testament God said they were to be treated fair and not threatened. God also said that ALL man were equal in the eyes of god. All in all the the bible talks more about voluntary slavery since that was big in this time and made laws to protect slaves of this kind any kidnaped man that was made slave against his own will was wrong. American slavery pretty much went against all these laws. Slaves were taken against their own will they were not treated fair and many were killed even returning a slave that had excaped was against these rules set by God.
2007-12-10 04:24:32
·
answer #2
·
answered by Candace B 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
people had slaves at that time. those instructions dont mean God supports it, just trying to protect the slaves that the people would have kept anyway. i dont know if Jesus directly said anything about it or not, but considering he wanted everyone to be treated as equals, i dont think he supported it. also the golden rule isnt condusive to slavery and im sure there are at least a couple of passages in the Bible where Jesus condemns it, however i dont know where.
2007-12-07 08:25:27
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Jesus did answer the slave question, however it was edited out do to time constraints.
I asked my slave what she thought. She said that she agrees with God, adding that she has been very bad and asked to be whooped right then. It would have been non-christian of me not to oblige her. I'm not sure if I can trust her judgement however, after all, her idol is The Gimp with Slave running a close second. I must aplaud her for her conviction in her faith however. Good Job.
2007-12-07 08:39:12
·
answer #4
·
answered by paul k 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, isn't Christianity slavery of the mind? Why would they tell you slavery is wrong when it's the whole purpose?
Edit: bastuardo1 - if God was just trying to protect the slaves he could have said it is wrong to own slaves. It being the "Word of God" they would have to follow it. Wouldn't that protect the slaves more?
2007-12-07 08:32:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by russj 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Slavery in that time was not the kind of slavery that we have today. It was not a race thing per se. It was more or less a POW thing: "I take over your country and your people become my people's slaves." It would be like asking "Why did God speak in favor of winners getting the prize and Jesus didnt condemn it?"
Also, Jesus never spoke against the government or their actios. He didnt come to forcefully overthrow the earthly kingdoms, but to set up his heavenly kingdom on earth.
Also God gave TEN commandments and man turned them into over 600 rules!!!
2007-12-07 08:24:29
·
answer #6
·
answered by MrMyers 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
First, it fairly is truthfully achievable that he did. (And it is likewise achievable that he did no longer.) no person claims that the Bible documents each little thing Jesus ever suggested on each subject rely. Secondly, thinking Jesus suggested, "My kingdom isn't of this international", one in each of those subject rely does no longer inevitably be proper to his significant sermon subjects. Jesus became centred on the eternal and not the temporal. interior the long term point of view of the relationship between the author and the human race, slavery isn't inevitably a severe precedence subject rely. Thirdly, the question means that our subject rely priorities interior the twenty first century could be of comparable precedence interior the 1st century. Fourthly, why do you %. out slavery for extra effective emphasis? How approximately financial exploitation usually (which Jesus DID address)? does no longer that subject rely (which easily includes the corporation of Roman slavery) be of better precedence magnitude? Now think you have been to bypass returned in time and marketing campaign against slavery. What would you put in its place? after all, if captives of conflict weren't became into slaves, they might maximum possibly be carried out. Is that your selection? (Do you want genocide to slavery?) And for that rely, who had it worse in first century Rome (as an occasion): a patrician's nicely-knowledgeable slave OR the day laborer residing in interior of sight slums? Which do you think of had the terrific threat of upward financial mobility and destiny potentialities? Frankly, those varieties of naive, anachronistic presuppositions mirror extra poorly upon modern-day critics than they do upon the alleged failure of Jesus to house their own alternatives. and a few cases the actual international includes concerns a strategies faraway from idealistic fantasies.
2016-11-14 19:26:22
·
answer #7
·
answered by sachiko 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
My dear friend. There is suffer enough in this world, isn't´t it?
Since the beginning there are, pain, exploitation, slavery, illness and so on...
The men,specially the atheists put all the blame on Gods lap.To deny his existence (isn´t it odd?).
But its not God´s guilt.
God gave to the men the chance to change the bad things, by doing the rightousness, loving each other and obbeying Him!
But, the men did not want to follow the rules. So, God left them
to their own will and as the natural law says: one havests what seeds.
2007-12-07 08:50:42
·
answer #8
·
answered by evaldo57 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
People that owed money back in the bible days would become slaves to pay off their debts.
God got His people out of slavery (Israel left Egypt). Apparently, He (God) didn't like it.
Why are you blaming God for something that man did?
This has nothing to do with God and everything to do with what man will do to another man.
2007-12-07 08:20:52
·
answer #9
·
answered by Salvation is a gift, Eph 2:8-9 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Because in Christianity, slavery is ok. Many Christians during the time right before the civil war used the bible to defend slavery.
2007-12-07 08:19:00
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋