2007-12-07 06:24:46 · 24 answers · asked by A.M.D.G 6 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
More importantly, when will all the people in those church's come back into the fold and full communion.
2007-12-07 07:28:33 · answer #1 · answered by Ed H 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If King Henry VIII had the ability to see the future, he probably wouldn't have done it. He started Anglicanism, but if you look at the beliefs of Henry VIII's Anglican church, it was still very Catholic minded. It was a schism from The Catholic Church. Henry VIII was still very Catholic minded himself and rejected Protestant ideals. However, the Anglican Church of his son, Edward, went a very different direction. It changed and rejected Catholicism and accept Protestant ideals. This is how the Anglican church today remains. Politically is was a bad move for Henry to split with his wife for it put England at ends with Spain, who also had a very powerful navy and holdings in The New World. Also think about the territories that England already held? Think of the religious persecutions this opened the door for in England and Ireland. The Cumbrian people who were a separate group in England. After the Anglican Church decided that all people in England will speak and pray in only one language, English, the Cumbrians faced persecution. The Irish faced much persecution for their fervent Catholicism. What they went through could be called an ethnic cleansing.
2016-05-22 00:58:07 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
They won't - bad luck. Henry VIII moved against the Roman Catholic Church because it wanted to to control England. I am glad he did.
2007-12-07 06:29:30 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Every educated Catholic is a criminal, because the Roman cult claims to have the authority of Christ, but cannot prove it. Therefore, everything the RC cult possesses is stolen. Henry merely reclaimed some of it.
If justice was done, the RCC would have nothing at all, and would owe trillions in damages to millions of people. Ratzinger & co. should be doing hard labour for life. No joke.
Justice will be done in due course, btw. Not half.
.
2007-12-07 07:56:54 · answer #4 · answered by miller 5 · 0⤊ 4⤋
hahahah. LOL.
The English people, with their blood and taxes built those. As long as Englishmen are using them, even if it's as Anglicans, which does in fact have a direct lineage to the Apostles, they're going to good use. Variety is actually stronger than Uniformity.
2007-12-07 06:28:39 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
When will the peasants get back all the land stolen by the catholic church?
2007-12-07 07:23:48 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
They did under his daughter
Mary's first act was to repeal the Protestant legislation of her brother, Edward VI, hurling England into a phase of severe religious persecution. Her major goal was the re-establishment of Catholicism in England
2007-12-07 06:40:40 · answer #7 · answered by Fred3663 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Who says we want them back? They are their own church now with their set of doctrines. I don't have anything against Anglicans/Episcopalians, I like many of them actually.
2007-12-07 07:10:07 · answer #8 · answered by cynical 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
They already did. Mary Tudor. Keep reading your history, she's two more down the list.
2007-12-07 07:09:22 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Soon as they give back all the relics they stole from the Orthodox. Apparently what goes around comes around.
2007-12-07 06:35:39 · answer #10 · answered by NONAME 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋