Yes.
2007-12-07 05:46:03
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Then how come the Greeks, who have been the founders of high quality judgment which includes Aristotle and Plato, proved the life of God logically? > They lived in an age while claiming that the gods have been responsible for each little thing became the only clarification. bear in techniques, the Greeks additionally believed that the earth became infinitely old too. So if the assumption in God is illogical, it wouldn’t make experience that the founders of high quality judgment proved God’s life logically. So it’s the disbelief in God that's illogical. > No, with the aid of fact this latest day issues have replaced. So the founders of high quality judgment suggested that there could be a God, proving it logically. > How? besides, the shown fact that your disbelief in God is illogical, is using the fact asserting "layout doesn’t point out a clothier" is illogical. > What layout? we don't be conscious layout in nature (eating and respiration by the comparable hollow, genetic issues and so on.), layout's maximum suitable objective is simplicity, and we are a strategies from straightforward. basic experience tells us that if some thing has a development, some thing has to have made that development. That’s basic experience. That’s our life adventure. > basic experience hardly coincides with technological information, i'd recommend examining "The technological information of Discworld" for a view in this. in an attempt to end that the full component had a clothier to layout those types is life like and logical. To end that it has no clothier, that it’s all by twist of fate, it fairly is unreasonable and illogical. > No, there became no clothier, the clothier thought has been got here upon desiring. additionally, the assumption of an twist of fate is a fallacy, threat is an phantasm. Believing that there is a god that prides your thought in him over each little thing else, who you are able to purely get closer to by eating his flesh and eating his blood, who died and rose from the ineffective without problems on a similar time as making a extensive deal out of it, all with the aid of fact a clay guy and rib woman ate an apple spoke of to them by a talking snake six thousand years in the past in a backyard with (apparently) dinosaurs, on the different hand, is illogical. do no longer you compromise?
2016-11-14 19:00:25
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes ! I believe you are capable of loving anyone at any time in your life , no matter what religion or race . So go ahead and expand your mind and heart ,"there is already to much hate in the world today..
2007-12-07 05:53:03
·
answer #3
·
answered by ellimay oh 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why are athiests incapable of loving someone who believes?
Why would you think that>
2007-12-07 05:46:14
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
So much respect that you assume a group of people are incapable of love just because they don't believe in god.
2007-12-07 05:46:14
·
answer #5
·
answered by Emily 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
That is completely stupid in my opinion.
My mother and siblings are christian believers...I sure love them.
What does being atheist have to do with being able to love someone?
EDIT: Maybe I'll go with Marta on this one, eh? Whatever she is saying seems to be well thought out enough.
2007-12-07 05:46:54
·
answer #6
·
answered by Star 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
of course they are capable of loving someone who believes. Just because they don't have the same belief doesn't mean they cant still be friends or love eachother.
2007-12-07 05:46:31
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I would certainly hope so since atheists, like everything and everyone else on this planet were created by God and thus have all the standard options, including love for fellow humans.
2007-12-07 05:45:54
·
answer #8
·
answered by credo quia est absurdum 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
it would seem that you have run into a rather cruel bunch of atheists. the majority of us are as cuddly as teddybears. however, if you poke us with a stick (force your beliefs on us) and we will react like any other bear and fight back with a rather full arsenal, including but not limited to: logic, sense and above all, the independence to not need a god to tell us what to do. the majority have a "live and let live" outlook.
2007-12-07 05:54:19
·
answer #9
·
answered by Chaos 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
As a Buddhist I'm essentially atheist... but I have lots of friends of varying faiths, including Muslims, Catholics, etc. so I guess you could say I'm capable of it. How can one not love other people who are compassionate, altruistic, etc.?
_()_
2007-12-07 05:46:23
·
answer #10
·
answered by vinslave 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
I could feel compassion for someone mentally ill, but if they cannot distinguish reality from fantasy (ie - believing in talking mules and praying to zombies), no, I could not open myself enough to "love" them. It could be too potentially dangerous. People who are so out of touch with reality and generally unstable, and a danger to themselves and others.
2007-12-07 05:47:10
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋