English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

19 answers

Because the scientists and atheists are the ones who are out planting dinosaur bones all night. Who better would know where to look?

2007-12-07 04:07:38 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 7 1

They are more trustworthy by far than preachers who pass around plates for regular offering, special offering and building fund. There is no evidence for creationism at all. There is just nonsense uttered by preachers and creationists. you sound as if you believe scientists are conspiring against you. Open your eyes and see they are not the ones with 3 collection plates every Sunday. The most intelligent Christains accept evolution, because there is just too much evidence for it for it. i know a preacher who accepts evolution.

2007-12-07 04:11:19 · answer #2 · answered by miyuki & kyojin 7 · 0 0

Scientists collect evidence first, and draw conclusions later. That's the scientific way. Religious people start their thinking with an answer, not with a question.

2007-12-07 04:08:00 · answer #3 · answered by NaturalBornKieler 7 · 5 0

Well its because - like physics, biology, (and the rest) it is a science and studied using scientific method. IE it is therefore fact.

Why is it that all the 'evidence' of god and so collected by Christians - Isn't that convenient?

2007-12-07 04:10:19 · answer #4 · answered by Freethinking Liberal 7 · 1 0

because the butcher, baker and candlestick maker were busy at the moment.

Why is evidence collected by scientists? What kind of question is that? Why are surgeries done by surgeons? Why do you get your car worked on by a mechanic of all things?

2007-12-07 04:10:27 · answer #5 · answered by dj.hatchytt 3 · 0 0

The evidence itself would not easily go away any room for debate. people who declare in any different case the two lack information of the data, or wilfully refuse to renowned the glaring conclusions that such evidence factors to. for sure, between genuine biologists, there are none who're uneducated. The latter class are rather uncommon between credible scientists besides. they'd desire to hotel to pointing out park rangers as sources, besides as only mendacity, because of the fact the reality is that the medical community reaches their conclusions based on the evidence.

2016-11-13 23:35:51 · answer #6 · answered by caton 4 · 0 0

Hmm.. The very same people who support evolution are the ones collecting the evidence. That does sound fishy.

Could it be... Satan?

2007-12-07 04:07:27 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 8 1

how is evidence convenient?
evidence is proof in support of something, without evidence we would not be able to prove anything or learn

2007-12-07 04:09:44 · answer #8 · answered by Maid In Britain 5 · 1 0

Seems like this broad is onto the big conspiracy guys.


Can we get some AM hitman to take care of this before she spills the beans?

2007-12-07 04:13:20 · answer #9 · answered by Simon T 7 · 0 0

if you grow up among fossiliferous rocks it is difficult not asking yourself: 'why are all these extinct species visible in the stones i pass when i take a walk on the mountain?"

difficult, but not impossible: christians have thousands of years' practice at not asking obvious questions (or even getting them reported as a violation).

2007-12-07 04:08:41 · answer #10 · answered by synopsis 7 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers