WoW
i like dino´s,
it don´t prove the world to be a billion years old, i firmly believe Man and Dino lived side by side, after all, death did not start until after Adam and Eve sinned.
2007-12-07 03:54:00
·
answer #1
·
answered by FarmerCec 7
·
6⤊
6⤋
I wonder if this is the same site where they found dinosaurs stacked one on top of each other.
I don't think organs can be preserved for 5 billion years nor blood for DNA. The earth keeps getting younger with every find.
2007-12-07 12:07:42
·
answer #2
·
answered by Jeancommunicates 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
They should clone it and train it to eat people who think the world is only 5000 years old and who believe dinosaurs don't exist, That would be ironic!
2007-12-07 16:54:12
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
The parts are all fossilized (original tissues and bones replaced with minerals).
It's not really better preserved, just that the tissue lasted long enough not to have a solid structure replace it after it decayed away.
It's not proof that it died any more recently, just that the conditions were better for preservation.
2007-12-07 11:57:27
·
answer #4
·
answered by Tolga K. 2
·
4⤊
0⤋
Why wouldn't dinosaurs have organs? Finding a mummified dinosaur would, seem to me to include some internal organs.
2007-12-07 11:56:02
·
answer #5
·
answered by Misty 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
Do you mean partially preserved organs?
Partially formed organs would be odd, and would challenge certain aspects of biology.
2007-12-07 11:54:05
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
0⤋
I'll be saying "Neat!". Others might say "I wonder what that would taste like?"
2007-12-07 11:59:55
·
answer #7
·
answered by Rev. Still Monkeys 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Make a real one!
2007-12-07 11:55:06
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
It's dead !!!
2007-12-07 17:59:30
·
answer #9
·
answered by Andy 3
·
0⤊
0⤋