Does a baby born without intercourse mean the mother had never had intercourse?

Question

Lets get literal. Genesis mentions intercourse at the birth of Cain and Seth. The Bible does not mention intercourse at the birth of Abel. Eve said "I have given birth with the help of god". That statement is out of place in Genesis. It should be after the birth of Abel. That does not mean Eve had never had intercourse. Just Abel was born without it. In context that would make Abel the Lamb of God slain at the founding of the world.
There is no other option.
The following question will be scoffed at by some. It is a very serious question concerning Christianity and the "Archilles Heel" of the virgin birth of Jesus.
Could it be that Julius Caesar was trying to reinact the birth of Abel with himself as god and Jesus as Abel. Then Caesar could sacrifice Jesus and become equal in loss with God. Then God would be paid back. The death sentence against man could be reversed. That is what happened.
The trade was unequal. Jesus could not have been born without intercourse. Literal.

Answer 1

Oh G-d, your boring.

Answer 2

what do you mean, "there is no other option" -- the other option is that you're an idiot and want to force some strange meaning onto the passage which isn't there. Eve's statement simply reflects her expectation of fulfillment of God's promise given in Genesis 3:15. Stop dabbling (well actually it seems you're deep in it) in nonsense.

Quoting from Genesis 4 we see you've got certain facts wrong:

Now Adam knew Eve his wife, and she conceived and bore Cain, saying, "I have gotten a man with the help of the LORD." And again, she bore his brother Abel.

When it says "Adam KNEW Eve", that is a euphemism (or rather a deeper idiom) for intercourse. And then immediately after we're told she conceived Cain (her firstborn) and she makes that statement about Cain, not Abel! So your whole argument falls apart because your premise is all wrong and doesn't fit the passage.

Then the passage says "And agaiin...." Any reasonable person would understand that again the had intercourse, and she conceived.

Answer 3

Please consider leaving your child whole and perfect; as nature made him. I suggest looking at the site; CIRCUMSTITIONS. The doctors won't tell you about the ramifications and complications from this totally unnecessary mutilation of the penis. Even though your own husband doesn't have a problem with his penis, it can happen to your son. Roughly 10% of circumcisions require additional surgeries to attempt repair of damage from the first one. Yes it is archaic, barbaric and cruel. It damages the penis, destroys sexual sensitivity, and in my case caused me to be unable to achieve orgasm in normal sex, due to the nerve damage and much more than the average loss of sensitivity. I hate my parents (both deceased) for perpetrating this on me and ruining my life. Circumcision of female minors is illegal in the US, but males don't have the same protection under the law, even though it's genital mutilation, just as in females. This is sexist and unconstitutional. Just because a couple of misguided religions mutilate helpless infant males doesn't make it right. They even try to spread it to others, and succeeded in the US until recently. Now the rate has fallen to about 50% and continues to decline. It doesn't take a lot of intelligence to realize that a whole, natural and normal penis with foreskin feels and functions better than one made partial, mutilated and scarred by circumcision. If you don't have your child circumcised, just remember not to allow ANYONE to attempt to retract his foreskin; it's fused to the glans, and isn't supposed to be retracted until he's eight or older, after it has had time to develop. It doesn't need special cleaning, any more than an infant girl would need a douche. Nature takes care of these things. A foreskin is not a birth defect; it is a birthright.

Answer 4

The problem we have here is that the actual book of Genisis was lost, and the book we have today was the best that could be remenbered by two diferent jewish communities. One from the north and one from the south. That is why there are two difering creation stories etc. Not knowing which if any was right both were included..!!

Answer 5

This is a ridiculous question. There is only ONE Virgin birth on record, that of Jesus .

Now , today, YES, one can have a child without intercourse via artificial insemination.

Answer 6

well now THAT has given me something to think about, as well as something to discuss with the family over the christmas holiday. i can't wait to read about it in the bible over the weekend. you may be on to something.

Answer 7

omg.
Did you escape today, or did someone actually give you a day-pass?

Answer 8

yes no sex = no sex