English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

17 answers

No, I've never heard of this. If she wanted to that would be nice and more than generous but she isn't obligated to do so. At my wedding I payed for transportation for the guests at the hotel (mainly my family) to get to and from the reception as a courtesy. I rented a big van so they wouldn't have to drive. I also paid for my aunt's hotel room because I know she couldn't afford to come and she really wanted to be at my wedding. I wanted her there too.

2007-12-07 10:36:01 · answer #1 · answered by JM 6 · 0 0

At really ritzy weddings I've been to, the parents of the groom paid for the lodging for all the wedding party. And I've also been to a small wedding where they rented two beach houses to have the wedding outside on the beach. Then guests stayed in the houses. But they only had about 30 people. I believe they split it and the brides family rented one house, the groom's rented the other. Of course the bride and groom stayed elsewhere.

But at weddings nowadays--when you might have 200 out of town guests, I've never heard of a regular person (not a celebrity) wedding when the out of town lodging was paid for.

2007-12-07 02:07:47 · answer #2 · answered by phantom_of_valkyrie 7 · 1 0

no. If you will be having out of town guests, it would be either the bride's and groom's (or who ever is planning the wedding), responsiblility to contact a local hotel and see about getting a discount for the guests.

You/they would contact the hotel's convention/event planner and tell them how many guests you are expecting who will be getting rooms and then reserve a block of rooms for a discounted price. It is the guests responsiblity to pay for the room. If they can't, then they will have to make other arrangements for their stay or not come.

2007-12-07 02:20:35 · answer #3 · answered by Invisigoth 7 · 1 0

I've never heard of that. Typically the out of town guests pay for their own travel expenses, including lodging.

2007-12-07 03:48:43 · answer #4 · answered by SE 5 · 0 0

Our out of town guests paid for their own rooms. I have never heard of the mother of the groom paying for it.

2007-12-07 02:01:47 · answer #5 · answered by vaya 4 · 1 0

The only historic practice in weddings is for the brides parents to pay for the ceremony. Today this is a practice that shouldn't be done unless of course they're stinking rich.

2007-12-07 02:07:18 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

No, there is no such thing. And as a guest, I wouldnt allow someone to pay for my hotel room if I accepted the invitation to the wedding.

2007-12-07 02:11:11 · answer #7 · answered by fizzy stuff 7 · 1 0

Not unless you are a Rockefeller or are absolutely desperate to get people to come. The only thing the grooms parents do is make sure that he turns up at the ceremony in a sober fashion.

2007-12-07 02:09:47 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

that is the craziest thing I have heard. The out of town guests pay for themselves.

2007-12-07 02:12:14 · answer #9 · answered by ilene m 3 · 1 0

I don't know if it's common practice, but yes, my fiance's mother is doing this for close family (his and mine). However, she is very well-off, while my family is not.
She insisted on doing this. Apperently, she thinks it's tradition.

2007-12-07 17:12:43 · answer #10 · answered by ktswim 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers