If they're anything like the self-styled militias around here, they'll wind up shooting each other.
Trigger happy nuts.
2007-12-07 09:14:13
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Well currently there are no trigger happy rambos at either our Northern or Southern Borders. Are you advocating the placement of such people at the borders ?
As for the poster who CLAIMS to live near the border and states there are no problems. Either you're misrepresenting yourself and live no where near a border or you walk around all day with your eyes closed. I grew up less than 12 miles from Mexicali (Capital of Baja California) and there are litterally 100's making illegal crossings everyday.
2007-12-07 03:44:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
I think they should be out there shooting more drug smuggling king pins rather than sitting behind bars. I think that the government policy should allow for more use of force (including deadly) to stop the flow of illegals but more specifically drugs so that border patrol officers dont have to be even the slightest bit worried about filing a report that they shot at a big time drug smuggler.
2007-12-07 01:58:46
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
If it does take place many well being and financial subject concerns may well be resolved. Canada's rules relating to the pharmaceutical industry would desire to be included into the US making well being care greater low-value for persons who're in dire want of drugs that are at the instant being processed in Canada for a fragment of the value for taxation and price lists for them to be dropped on the US. Mexico's financial device would advance by ability of leaps and bounds by ability of incorporating the fast industry of the US into Mexico's crumbling infrastructure. even though it is going to take it sluggish for the two a type of subject concerns to be addressed and a practicable plan to incorporate them positioned into action that's for sure glaring that each physique 3 worldwide places will benefit. i'm a supporter of Hillary and truly desire she would be able to discover the moxie to greenback as much as congress and the chiefs of team to make this superb worldwide experience ensue.
2016-11-13 23:20:45
·
answer #4
·
answered by apley 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you are thinking about the Polish fellow who lost life in Vancouver Canada, while my opinion is the police were trigger happy, the precipitant determinant was an ill prepared, equipped and non-caring staff; bad policy and labor regulations internal to the Airport immigration and customs. Slow and violent are two bad qualities in one system.
2007-12-07 12:54:03
·
answer #5
·
answered by Psyengine 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
I think we need more of them.
Look, anyone that takes the issue offensively is not putting America first. In this day and age of terrorism we NEED the borders to be closed to illegal immigration.
Legal immigration is great, and is part of what made this country how wonderful it is. However, illegal immigration is a scourge and a very possible entry point for terrorists.
I say we need more gun toting "Rambos" until we FIX the borders so that no illegal immigration can occur.
Good luck!
2007-12-07 01:50:00
·
answer #6
·
answered by Scott D 4
·
6⤊
1⤋
I only wish there were trigger-happy Rambos on the borders!
2007-12-07 03:53:16
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
I think that is a loaded question. We have one of the easiest immigration laws in the world. Do you know in New Zealand and Australia they will deny you for your weight? Do you know in Canada if you are sick at all you cannot immigrate? In Mexico's southern borders they kill so many people immigrating from South America trying to come to Mexico that it would make you weep. So before you spout off about how horrible America is, try to look around you a bit more.
2007-12-07 01:48:22
·
answer #8
·
answered by Mrs. Mad Maddy 4
·
10⤊
2⤋
Trigger happy rambos? What do you mean by that? When you give me solid proof that the border guards are shooting everyone on sight then I'll answer your question fully...
(And about that minefield...yeah...sorry about that...lol)
2007-12-07 01:48:14
·
answer #9
·
answered by zeldasmage 2
·
9⤊
2⤋
I think if the government refuses to end a detrimental problem, then they can't expect anything else from the citizens on the front lines of the problem.
2007-12-07 03:14:19
·
answer #10
·
answered by smellyfoot ™ 7
·
4⤊
0⤋